ImmaculateKadence said:
He's been flapping his gums all season and doesn't have the palmares to back it.
I've not heard him 'flapping his gums'. I've seen a couple of interviews. One in which he says he feels his form merited a slot at Milan-San Remo, and one in which he accepted that he would never get top billing at Columbia so would need to look elsewhere to get it.
Greipel hasn't been the one flapping his gums. Cavendish has been the one flapping his (expensively modified) gums. Why? Because Cav knows that, when they're both on form, he would crush Greipel. But he also knows that he hasn't been on form as often as Greipel this year, and so questions have been asked that he feels shouldn't have had to be asked if he'd not been so foolish as to ignore doctor's orders. Cavendish has been lucky/proven correct in that Greipel has disappointed in the Giro, but Greipel must have been cursing his luck to fall ill when he did, because there was speculation as to whether or not he'd even start. This will probably be his only top-tier shop window this year as Cav will take all the other premier events, leaving Greipel with Austria, Poland and Eneco as usual, and there is no further case for Greipel to make at that level. He won four stages of the Vuelta last year, so that's a fairly strong case.
Cavendish is a better sprinter than Greipel. No argument can be made against that. But it is patently false to call Greipel a second-tier sprinter. Or to spin it that he's been whining and moaning about his position like he's Leif Hoste or something. That's the position of the Cav fanboy. Should Greipel be beating some of the riders who've beaten him this year? Yes, yes he should. But on the same level, Cavendish should not be having his back side whipped by JJ Haedo and Francesco Chicchi either.