Cavendish won the World Championships wearing an illegal helmet!!

Page 2 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
May 25, 2009
403
1
0
Would simply riding in a helmet without holes be illegal too, or is it just adding covers which was objectionable?
 
Jul 30, 2009
1,735
0
0
bavarian rider's new helmet

lotrsshbt_f.jpg
 
May 20, 2010
877
0
0
It is a pretty poor rule and there are examples in every race where the rule is not followed.

ie the rule is unmanageable unless the UCI are notifying riders when it is too hot for them to use shoe covers.

Other examples of similar helmet covers include use by Kelly Benefits in the ToC for the TT.

Curious though Bavarianrider, where are the other examples of the British being favoured by the UCI?
 
Mar 18, 2009
4,186
0
0
Seriously this calls for a photoshop of him wearing a penguin suit with the caption "cavendish skinsuit alleged illegal"
 
Mar 10, 2009
1,295
0
0
Bavarianrider said:
Illegal is illegal. And at those speeds, such an helmet can easily have a benifit of 1 or 2 km/H
Sure it can! At 70 KPH I suppose the effect would be most pronounced but maybe his very small profile was cheating too! TRY 0.1 to 0.2 kph. Truth is you don't have a wind tunnel to verify your wild exaggeration. Just from memory I think Cav was going more than 1 or 2 KPH faster than anyone else and that helmet cover isn't the reason he won.
They should not have allowed it. To that I agree.
 
Aug 16, 2011
10,819
2
0
Something like this is not redeemable, I say we ban him from ever riding a bike again, and lets take his wolrds victory away from him as well as his milan san remo win and green jersey, who know what other pieces of aero equipment he was using in those sprints.

Useless
Corrupt
Incompetent
 
Dancing On The Pedals said:
He was also wearing a skinsuit (as was Greipel at the TDU) so are they going to outlaw that as well, as that clearly falls into the 'designed to influence the performances of a rider such as reducing air resistance or modifying the body of the rider' category?!?! The phrase 'storm in a teacup' springs to mind... ;)

No, they won't outlaw wearing skinsuits in road races. But they should. It's as offensive as doping in my book.

Don't care about the helmet issue.
 
Jul 30, 2009
1,621
0
0
Libertine Seguros said:
No, they won't outlaw wearing skinsuits in road races. But they should. It's as offensive as doping in my book.

Don't care about the helmet issue.

Quite right. They look Bl00dy awful.
 
Jun 1, 2011
2,500
0
0
Bavarianrider said:
Illegal is illegal. And at those speeds, such an helmet can easily have a benifit of 1 or 2 km/H

The UCI has history of (TT Saddle Position) never going retroactive. They just decide to start enforcing what got by them in the first place.:(
 
Apr 19, 2010
1,112
0
0
boomcie said:
I also read somewhere that Tony Martin won the TT at the worlds using an illegal amount of aerodynamic saliva. He's been using that stuff for quite some time now.


What gains he gets aerodynamically from anything are surely wasted with that gormless trout pout!
 
Jul 29, 2009
441
0
0
I'm sure he was wearing it to prevent flies and other insects getting in his hair. I hate that as well, totally understandable.

If he had worn a different helment that didn't have vents would that have been fine or do helmets have to have vents in them?
 
Apr 14, 2010
727
0
0
TeamSkyFans said:
I think Lotto were probably just stopped from wearing them by over excited aussie officials who worried it might give them an edge against their greenedge team.

As per usual you have the facts wrong, it was a UCI official not an Australian official. You need to get over it. Your anti Australian/GreenEDGE posts have made you one of the most boring/repetitive posters on the forum, and that is saying something.
 
Jul 30, 2009
1,621
0
0
PCutter said:
As per usual you have the facts wrong, it was a UCI official not an Australian official. You need to get over it. Your anti Australian/GreenEDGE posts have made you one of the most boring/repetitive posters on the forum, and that is saying something.

Might have been somewhat tongue in cheek, I reckon?

Either way GREENedge get what they deserve. ;)
 
Ok this is totally unacceptable, standards must be maintained.

Banning is too good for him, I think he should be hung, drawn and quartered. And then banned for life. And beyond. :rolleyes: