Changes Cookson has implemented at UCI

Page 18 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Jul 25, 2012
12,967
1,970
25,680
Tinman said:
Agreed, but it's important to not lose momentum. Which is what is happening now.

The Pro cycling tour is a circus yet again with no-one in their right mind believing things are cleaner anymore. Which at least was the case 6-9 months ago. In fact it's a free for all. If you're not on it you won't win, and even the journo's have gone Omerta again.

What;s the timing on the T&R?

Definitely, but it can't be rushed. I'm willing to give them huge leeway on it considering how long Pat and Hein were in charge and the suspected corruption, but we do need to know that things are progressing.

For what it's worth I'm sure there was a report recently about people either being called to give evidence or volunteering to.

Afraid I don't know the timeline, did they even set a hard and fast one?
 

thehog

BANNED
Jul 27, 2009
31,285
2
22,485
Yay! :cool:

Race organisers IMG have confirmed that on-bike cameras will be used during this week’s Tour de Suisse, which started with a time trial in Bellinzona on Saturday.

In cooperation with a number of World Tour teams, IMG has created an agreement for cameras to be installed on the front and rear of race bikes throughout the peloton. A number of teams including Team Sky have signed up for the project and Cyclingnews understands that the teams will alternate using the cameras during the Swiss stage race.

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/on-bike-cameras-to-be-used-at-the-tour-de-suisse
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
Cookson managing the sport much better than previous presidents, but so could a 6 year old.

Not much doing in the way of cleaning up the sport though, not that i ever thought that was on his radar.
 
Aug 16, 2011
10,819
2
0
Is this camera thing the most significant change he has implemented so far?

Because if so, that's rather sad. And he probably needs to step it up. :eek:
 
Jul 10, 2010
1,006
1
10,485
Have those bank account paying in books be found ?

Well we know Cookson had been the BC rep at the UCI for several years at the time of the alleged Lance donations to the UCI to help anti-doping campaign. In all the years up to his election, including his time on the executive committee, his computer was suffering a failure - no link between keyboard and CPU, and although he really did want to write to Hein or Pat about it, he just couldn't.

We know, according to Lance, he was not canvassed for the donation and he just woke up one morning and wrote out a cheque and popped it in the mail, like you do, when you have over 100k knocking around that you just can't think what to spend it on.

So in the last 9 months, since the bearded one inherited Pat's laptop and after he had all the rude pop-ups wiped off, has Cookson managed to find out when the cheque arrived or what was done with it or has he decided - too hot too handle and just enjoyed the fun creating the diversions?
 
Oct 16, 2010
19,912
2
0
good point freddythefrog.

good paragraph by innerring on cookson's conflict of interest and the granting of froome's tue:
Also when the UCI says “The UCI President and the UCI Administration have absolutely no involvement with decisions on TUEs” hopefully that’s correct. But involvement and influence are not the same. When someone in an organisation is tasked with taking a decision that rules over their bosses family there’s always an unconscious influence. It might be tiny but it’s there. The UCI should instead be pointing to rigorous management practices to protect against conflict of interest concerns.
http://inrng.com/2014/06/jdd-uci-froome/
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
anyone remember this....

“I hope to begin a new era of collaboration, openness and transparency in cycling and restore the trust that has been lost in our great sport”

– @BrianCooksonUCI, june 2013

:D
 
Aug 27, 2012
1,436
0
0
Brian on twitter just now. Nothing to see here just move along.

Will the legacy be "The man who had the opportunity to change things but didn't?" or "The Game Changer for Professional Sport".

No point hanging in the middle Brian. There is no middle.
 
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
Tinman said:
Brian on twitter just now. Nothing to see here just move along.

Will the legacy be "The man who had the opportunity to change things but didn't?" or "The Game Changer for Professional Sport".

No point hanging in the middle Brian. There is no middle.

Thank you Sir Chris for finding the flaws in the system, if anyone tries something like that again we will put a stop to it.

All you need to know about Cookson was that he promised to make doping independent, yet he has Zorzoli running TUEs all by himself. Seems legit.
 

thehog

BANNED
Jul 27, 2009
31,285
2
22,485
Cookson himself was at the Tour de Romandie.

Perhaps he approved the TUE personally? :rolleyes:

n4dpfm.jpg
 
Aug 27, 2012
1,436
0
0
When Rome burns, Nero fiddles...

Brian Cookson OBE ‏@BrianCooksonUCI 9h
We should all think about our impact on the environment. E.g. Dropping gel wrappers is unacceptable at any level.
 
Sep 2, 2012
36
0
0
So dropping Prednisolone is ok but dropping sweetie wrappers is not.
Thanks Brian you are really making a difference.......
 
Oct 16, 2010
19,912
2
0
thehog said:
Cookson himself was at the Tour de Romandie.

Perhaps he approved the TUE personally? :rolleyes:

n4dpfm.jpg

i'm a bit disappointed by the very nature of the joint UCI/Sky fraud.
it's turning into such a nobrainer.
 
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
JimmyFingers said:
Yes, I am 100% certain that is exactly what happened

Hard to be 100% sure without evidence. But maybe Cookson decided to hand out a sacrificial lamb after TUE and inhalergate.

Also makes you wonder what was going all with all those sick sky riders pulling out earlier in the year.
 

thehog

BANNED
Jul 27, 2009
31,285
2
22,485
the sceptic said:
Hard to be 100% sure without evidence. But maybe Cookson decided to hand out a sacrificial lamb after TUE and inhalergate.

Also makes you wonder what was going all with all those sick sky riders pulling out earlier in the year.

One only has to read the Agostini letter to be aware of the "favouritism" abound at the UCI...

Apparently horse steroids are all good. 0.000000007 grams of face cream is a 15 month suspension ;)

To the attention of Mr. Leroux Dominique
UCI – CH 1860 Aigle/ Suisse

Object : UCI file 043/2013 – Agostini Stefano

Dear Sirs,

I want to clarify that my acceptance of the sanction is to be understood as a declaration of capitulation: I give up to a system that has decided that at age 25 I should stop being a professional cyclist.

I think the sanction you have decided for me is not right and I do not feel at all belong to me since I have never made use of performance-enhancing drugs.

My biological passport is impeccable, the different and multiple blood tests can not be faulted.

It is just that the emeritus laboratory in Cologne has detected the presence of 0.7 billionths of a gram in my urine of a substance called Clostebol, the active ingredient of the ointment Trofodermin that I myself had declared at the time of the test and that I had been regularly prescribed by a doctor to treat a rash.

The laboratory has reported, in infinitesimal extent, what I had said in perfect good faith. If I had not declared it probably now I would not be in this paradoxical situation because it would not even been found. This will remain a strong and unresolved question in my mind.

Everybody knows that you can’t dope with an ointment, for more prescribed by your doctor, and sold in any pharmacy or drugstore, even without medical prescription.

Well after 7 long months of suspension, explanations of the factual circumstances of the case, requests of additional information with maturities of short and peremptory time, of grueling waiting for some kind of feedback from you (which came systematically after weeks by my questioning), wear and tear and stress mixed with apprehension … the esteemed UCI, despite having a very clear situation documented beyond any doubt, decided to treat me in such a way besides significantly more severe than other athletes “stumbled” into Trofodermin, even the same way as who does and has done in the past use of EPO, cocaine, blood transfusions, or manipulations of his own blood, proposing a 15-month ban, in addition to the payment of the expenses incurred by you, which is almost like a bad joke.

If your conclusion is to impose me a disqualification undoubtedly excessive, what is most striking are the reasons for this choice. The documentation produced by me duly in your terms proved the truthfulness of my version and then my honesty, the UCI itself has recognized the use of Trofodermin cream for a therapeutic purpose, motivated by a medical prescription, but this explanation and justification was not enough, given the imputation of liability.

This is the process culmination of sanction acceptance that you proposed me months ago, with the stated purpose of speeding up the decision and avoid a trial and related expenses. Obviously none of this has happened and the conclusion then is grotesque.

The alternative that I have is the transmission of the dossier to the Italian Cycling Federation with the steering of the process, the outcome of which will have to confirm the authority deciding the 15-month disqualification otherwise the UCI itself, as already stated candidly in a veiled blackmail tone, will recourse to CAS in Lausanne; for myself this would obviously mean conducting counter and expertise, contribution to a legal defense of the mandate as well as the appointment of arbitrators for a total cost of around 30-35,000 Euros that I don’t have.

I dare say, in the light of the absurd conclusion of this case, that the UCI Anti-Doping “network” has undoubtedly some malfunction since it does not make a distinction with regard to who gets stuck there, even in the light of the circumstances that are certainly worth to distinguish one case from another, as mine and the one of a “real” drug-taking in order to alter performance and distort the results.

Reiterating then as the end of my cycling career due exclusively to 0.7 nanograms (0.000000007 g) Clostebol coming, for your same recognition, as an ointment used once in order to cure, under medical advice, a demonstrated disease, I would like to add that from this vicissitude a deep and intractable disillusionment in the values of honesty, justice, and equality in the sense of treating equal situations [equally] and different situations in different ways remain me.

I leave professional cycling with dignity, knowing that I never cheated and I conquered all my results with dedication and sacrifice, well aware that this absurd story has also caused considerable damage to my image.

Finally, I think that this story, which has ruined my career and destroyed my dreams, will also undermine the credibility, usefulness, and infallibility of your doping control system.

Sincerely,
Stefano Agostini


http://velonews.competitor.com/2014...-doping-suspension_323757#zwmjQmP0RiyKMfR1.99
 
Feb 28, 2010
1,661
0
0
Tinman said:
When Rome burns, Nero fiddles...

Brian Cookson OBE ‏@BrianCooksonUCI 9h
We should all think about our impact on the environment. E.g. Dropping gel wrappers is unacceptable at any level.

There's some history here. Journalists in the UK press have slated organised bike rides/races alleging that the cyclists have blocked the roads and dropped litter everywhere. Some areas of society would like all cycle races on the highway banned.
 
Feb 16, 2010
15,334
6,031
28,180
thank you thehog for republishing Stefano Agostini's letter.

Why is it not in the mandate of the MPCC to help poor guys like Stefano?
Two sides to the coin.