Re: Re:
Would put the Canadian races higher than the TDU/Plouay and Vattenfall as well.
But it is mainly nitpicking and up to debate.
I'd rate LBL the same as Roubaix and Lombardia the same as MSR and Flanders. Strade Bianche could get higher because it is such a cool race the riders themselves like so much.PremierAndrew said:El Pistolero said:warmfuzzies said:Vuelta has, in the past 12 years anyway, been a prize for either a Tour superdomestique or for someone coming off a disappointing Tour de France. Over the same period, Giro has been a half step more pretigious than Vuelta, with a number of top riders targeting it as their primary annual objective. Recently, nobody at the top of cycling has targeted the Vuelta as their primary season objective. It's like the girl you see at the bar near closing time.
In the last few years the Vuelta's field has been significantly better than in the early 2000s or any other part of its history actually. But I do agree that the Giro is more prestigious and also more beautiful. Still, winning the Vuelta is an impressive feat and I'd rate it higher than winning any of the five Monuments.
1. Tour
2. Giro
3. WC RR
4. Vuelta
5. The five Monuments
6. WC TT
7. T-A / P-N / Vuelta al Pais Vasco
8. G-W, FW, E3 Harelbeke, AGR
9. Dauphiné (too close to the Tour to be ranked higher)
10. Tour de Suisse (too close to the Tour and pathetic field)
Dauphine below Pais Vasco? What?
1. Tour
2. Giro
3. Vuelta
4. World RR
5. PR
6. LBL/RVV/MSR
7. Lombardia
8. WC TT
9. T-A/P-N/Dauphine
10. GW/E3/Fleche/AGR/Pais Vasco
11. Strade Bianche/Romandie/San Sebastian
12. Eneco/Suisse/Paris-Tours (These days at least)
13. Tour Down Under/Quebec/Montreal/Plouay/Vattenfall
Would put the Canadian races higher than the TDU/Plouay and Vattenfall as well.
But it is mainly nitpicking and up to debate.