The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Last time he tried, he didn't bounce so well...He'll bounce back.
I've done the opposite , my salary is ridiculously low, I'd gladly take the ridiculously high salary even if it looks bad!this surely can’t be the case of fans being impatient. It‘s almost two years since the accident now and Froome’s curve of recovery seems to have plateaued one year ago. So this means virtually zero improvement last 12 month - a timeframe that would typically represent 10% of one’s career.
On top of that - in today’s field with all the young guys emerging and records being smashed on regular basis even if Froome achieved his former levels, would that have been enough to compete for the win? It’s what he’s been claiming he would do this year and it’s what ISN signed him up for.
No this is not the case of anyone being impatient - it’s just that by now pretty much everyone realised it’s not gonna happen for him. Kudos for trying though. The only mistake he made in my opinion is having this ridiculous salary. It just looks bad. In mean of course he has the right to earn as much as he can but then again, his legacy is his responsibility...
Looking Bad can be the new Good! Especially if you're charitable in a quiet, antagonistic way that makes people crazy. Not saying Chris is that guy....I've done the opposite , my salary is ridiculously low, I'd gladly take the ridiculously high salary even if it looks bad!![]()
Still I can't see him recover to top (in his relative measure) level again.
However, a small silverlining on the horizon of Froome fans: He is a master of transformation. Not so much in 2011 at the Vuelta, since we all know that story but also in 2012. I remember that around this time in the year, many already considered him to be a fluke again.
DNF at 75th in GC at Volta Agarve in February
65th in GC at Criterium International in March
123th in GC at Tour de Romandie in April
No outstanding stage results either. Then Dauphine, he was clearly improved. And at the Tour he was arguably the strongest already. If he would be able to do this again, I do, however, wonder why his Vuelta showing last year was not better (which I initially totally expected when he lost his TdF spot).
It's amazing, he beat only 10 riders in the entire peloton. It was painful to watch, even for someone as awkward on the bike as Froome has always been, it looked every bit as bad as the time he put in. Just not smooth at all.On 4 km course Froome lost almost a minute to the winner, who was 16% faster than him (that's over 6km/h). On Velonews they say that Chris is slowly building towards the TdF...
https://www.velonews.com/news/road/chris-froome-continues-slow-build-toward-tour-de-france/
The question is: in what year?
Not as tragic as for the sponsors. They must be thinking 5 million ways to get out of the contract!This is getting moderately tragic now, both for him and his fanboys.
Not as tragic as for the sponsors. They must be thinking 5 million ways to get out of the contract!
We just dont know, but is possible. Today yo see him the 11th worst is quite sad anyway...But We must evaluate the entire race.I don't know what y'all are smoking thinking Froome is heading in the right direction. What direction is that? Retirement.
That's all fine, but surely you don't suggest that they're happy with the contract...I'm seeing a lot of mentions of ISN in the media. We're watching a sport where almost every race has an ultimately doomed breakaway because sponsors want that shirt on the coverage and in the news. There's certainly better coverage to be had than what they're getting now but the old cliche would have it that there's no bad publicity.
Tbh a 4km prologue would probably be the very worst type of effort for him right now. But yea dreadful