Red Rick said:
HelloDolly said:
Red Rick said:
HelloDolly said:
If you think that has any credibility whatsoever, you haven't been paying attention
I have been paying attention ...this is what was asked for and this is what he gave..VO2 max for instance was the cry of many cynics on here
And what's more it is more than what other riders are providing
But hey no matter what he does there will the same people with the big stick, sticking it to Froome and SKY
Give us your data
Oh it s not the right data
Oh we don't believe it
Oh we wanted this and not that
And you talk about credibility and paying attention
You think after all the stuff Sky's said, all the contradictions, all the media hype, this would be to go ahead with a clean slate? Power date proves nothing, VO2 max proves zilch. It was done in England for **** sake. Stuff like that is just too easy to get away with and everyone's buying it. There's just very few ways to prove you're legit, and doing such a dumb test certainly isn't one of them. Guy wins tour, tests himself 2 weeks later. Yeah, that's Tour winner power output right there. No **** ****.
I'm not gonna believe shams like this until someone comes up with a legit reason for me to not be sceptic about it.
I don't think anyone can open a closed biased mind...so yes you go one being a sceptic...its the refuge of the ignorant
So while you are at it lets be having your view on data from Contador the well know doper or Valverde ...no don't think so
Any can you stop with the racist slurs on England. Even if done on the north pole you wouln't be happy because you hate , hate, hate
. But the company (an american company) was picked for is accessibility and done in England because it was available) but hey you just demonstrating more ignorance and hatred.Just because it is an English test it has no credibility????? ....what an idiot you really are