Teams & Riders Chris Froome Discussion Thread.

Page 536 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.

Is Froome over the hill?

  • Yes.

    Votes: 42 34.4%
  • No, the GC finished 40 minutes ago but Froomie is still climbing it

    Votes: 65 53.3%
  • No he is totally winning the Vuelta

    Votes: 28 23.0%

  • Total voters
    122
Dec 6, 2013
8,519
7,801
23,180
So ASO is trying to keep CF from racing. I completely get their point. But. at this point it isn't about CF, its about how bad the UCI/WADA/CAS/others are because it should not take this long to make a decision. If he broke the rules that decision should have been made already so he must not have, and should be OK to race. If they keep him from racing and the end decision is that he was within the rules...eek! :eek:

Two disclaimers: I'm not defending CF, nor am I getting into the *CLINIC* discussion in this thread.
 
Aug 5, 2009
15,733
8,153
28,180
Re:

jmdirt said:
So ASO is trying to keep CF from racing. I completely get their point. But. at this point it isn't about CF, its about how bad the UCI/WADA/CAS/others are because it should not take this long to make a decision. If he broke the rules that decision should have been made already so he must not have, and should be OK to race. If they keep him from racing and the end decision is that he was within the rules...eek! :eek:

Two disclaimers: I'm not defending CF, nor am I getting into the *CLINIC* discussion in this thread.

It's a shambles of course. Every time it's mentioned by journalists you can just imagine people rolling their eyes.............the off season would be the perfect time to make major changes to the rules.
 
Oct 14, 2017
12,196
3,232
23,180
Re:

jmdirt said:
So ASO is trying to keep CF from racing. I completely get their point. But. at this point it isn't about CF, its about how bad the UCI/WADA/CAS/others are because it should not take this long to make a decision. If he broke the rules that decision should have been made already so he must not have, and should be OK to race. If they keep him from racing and the end decision is that he was within the rules...eek! :eek:

Two disclaimers: I'm not defending CF, nor am I getting into the *CLINIC* discussion in this thread.


And we just got another case (the Roson case) that proves they can't do anything in a timely manner. That case dates back to Jan 2017 and they just provisionally suspended him. They still haven't even given him a real decision yet.
 
Aug 6, 2010
6,884
6,216
23,180
Absolute farcical situation for the sport. Something questionable happens almost ten months ago, and we don't know one week before the biggest race on the calendar as to whether the rider in question is allowed to race or not. Try to explain that to a follower of any other sport. You can't.

Either way, make a decision!
 
Jun 20, 2015
15,366
6,032
28,180
This is the way the system is, especially if you want to strongly defend yourself with the best legal representation Think some live in a bubble in this forum - All these legal representatives whether Froome's side or the other side have busy lives and CAN'T be expected to drop their other work to work full time on Froome's case - My understanding is the Samuel Sanchez case pre-Vuelta and the case pre TDF have yet to be resolved and these were positive drug tests - One thing that interests me is whether RCS has a disrepute clause in their rules like the ASO ?
 
May 15, 2011
45,171
617
24,680
Feb 1, 2011
9,403
2,275
20,680
Re: Re:

LaFlorecita said:
They mention WADA but they are not involved at this point in the procedure yet?

Edit: never mind, it's just been confirmed by the UCI. What a farce.

I guess it makes sense for the UCI to get WADA's input on such a high profile decision, since they have more expertise, and also as far as I know a right to appeal an acquittal if they disagree.
 
Apr 15, 2014
4,254
2,341
18,680
Let the circus continue.
The other riders now know that limits are there to be exceeded. I'm sure this is in the best interest of the sport.
 
Jun 20, 2015
15,366
6,032
28,180
Good luck to Froome for winning the unwinnable case - The actual decision shows why this should have never been publically released - The UCI have bought the sport into disrepute.
 
Aug 20, 2017
1,397
0
5,480
Re:

silvergrenade said:
A month ago today. What a day that was! :)
DgisZAEVMAIiCEM.jpg

We will watch it again at Alpe d'Huez! :razz:
 
Aug 20, 2017
1,397
0
5,480
Re:

Laplaz said:
I'm pretty sure he will be taken down by someone during the Tour...

Wishful thinking.
What I'm sure Froome will smash'em all: Nibali, Valverde, Quintana, Bardet, Dumoulin, AYates, Porte, Landa, Fuglsang, Roglic, Uran........ :lol:
 

rick james

BANNED
Sep 2, 2014
7,677
110
12,680
Re: Re:

Bot. Sky_Bot said:
Laplaz said:
I'm pretty sure he will be taken down by someone during the Tour...

Wishful thinking.
What I'm sure Froome will smash'em all: Nibali, Valverde, Quintana, Bardet, Dumoulin, AYates, Porte, Landa, Fuglsang, Roglic, Uran........ :lol:
think he/she is talking about a drunk fan at the side of the road
 
May 15, 2011
45,171
617
24,680
Re:

Hugo Koblet said:
Great news. Now let's watch some great cycling as well.
Yes, great to see the small amount of credibility the sport still had left dragged through the mud. Can't wait for Froome to win his 4th and 5th GT in a row, going to be glorious. :rolleyes: