These charts look really cool, but I think they have a tendency to omit a lot of data. Especially for Froome, with a much longer career at the top level, there should be many more data points but they're not there. It makes no sense to include Col de Romme for Vingegaard but exclude climbs where Froome got obliterated like Los Muchachos. Also these graphs, because they focus on the highest outputs, will exclude many of the most difficult stages with massive time gaps.Sure, they are going faster, and there have been some advancements, possibly better riders, too. But between old / oldish guard riders like Quintana, Tomas, Bardet, and Yates hanging in there on big climbs at least periodically throughout the season and producing large numbers to a comparison of some of the numbers copied below, I'm not seeing evidence that peak Froome and Contador couldn't get on the Tour podium, as Bruyneel stated, or win a Tour. GT isn't even out of it this year at age 36. And he was never on the level of Froome and Contador.
Look at this comparison of Froome and Vingegaard. Pick some points, say 10 minutes. Froome is at ~7.1; Vingo is at ~6.8. Let's do 20. Froome is at ~6.6; Vingo is at 6.4. Vingo's curve is likely understated here because it overweights last year's climbs vs. this years. But Froome also has higher outliers as well; he seems to just suck at the Alpe, which has taken his performance down.
![]()
![]()
Everyone’s going faster than Pinot too, re: your username
Froome missing 0.5W/kg. So more like 30-40W instead of 10-15W.
View: https://youtu.be/DnMRAPCerVE?t=226
Yes, that day he showed he was among the 15 strongest riders of that Tour for the Queen stage...this year he is maybe among the 30...but It is difficukt to evaluate, becouse this year he is not loosing too much time any stage, that year yes...but becouse he was working...this Tour he is not working as he used to do the last year. But Froome that Tour was impressive, acording the circunstances of his team, that he was not predicted to ride that Tour, that he was quite new in cycling... not easy to come from Africa. But of course is his mental strentgh the diferente...he is not Evenepoel, much more new is cycling and winning Clásica de San Sebastián at 19...different development of riders. he is not Valverde Who doenst need to train hard to fly on the races... Froome had 2 years later with some good result, but most of them quite poor..and for that reason In didnt expect what happened in 2011..but It wanst a surprise looking at his 2008 Tour...Do you mean that he was better this year when he finished third vs 30th in 2008?
How can someone be so delusional? This is pure trolling.Yes, that day he showed he was among the 15 strongest riders of that Tour for the Queen stage...this year he is maybe among the 30...but It is difficukt to evaluate, becouse this year he is not loosing too much time any stage, that year yes...but becouse he was working...this Tour he is not working as he used to do the last year. But Froome that Tour was impressive, acording the circunstances of his team, that he was not predicted to ride that Tour, that he was quite new in cycling... not easy to come from Africa. But of course is his mental strentgh the diferente...he is not Evenepoel, much more new is cycling and winning Clásica de San Sebastián at 19...different development of riders. he is not Valverde Who doenst need to train hard to fly on the races... Froome had 2 years later with some good result, but most of them quite poor..and for that reason In didnt expect what happened in 2011..but It wanst a surprise looking at his 2008 Tour...
This was all a roundabout way of arguing that you are not going to convince me that if you gave 2009 Contador this Jumbo squad he wouldn’t win some Tours. For some reason just saw this documentary for the first time. The Lance stuff is a bit tough to watch, but it was a good reminder of what a legend Contador is for that Tour alone. 2nd in the prologue, insane Verbier climbing performance, 1st in the ITT over Cancelara (and it wasn’t a MTT). Ventoux was a walk in the park when the Tour was in the bag, which is why the numbers were low there.These charts look really cool, but I think they have a tendency to omit a lot of data. Especially for Froome, with a much longer career at the top level, there should be many more data points but they're not there. It makes no sense to include Col de Romme for Vingegaard but exclude climbs where Froome got obliterated like Los Muchachos. Also these graphs, because they focus on the highest outputs, will exclude many of the most difficult stages with massive time gaps.
In short, if we could literally teleport Vingegaard to 2013, I fully believe he beats Froome with his eyes closed. Does that mean he's a better rider than Froome/Contador? Not really, when guys like Thomas also got over a minute faster on AdH. I think eem, let's say 'environmental' factors changed.
Back up to 27th on GC. If he holds onto that or higher at the end, not a bad result.
I think finishing high on GC and stages mean the most to him. Just because looking at 11th overall doesn’t add much to his career when looking at it as a snapshot, it would mean a lot to him reaching that point when the last 2 years he was struggling and riding with the sprinters.Probably he's not thinking his gc result about at all. Doesn't mean absolutely anything to him to be 23rd or 17th or 11th when palmares like that.. More likely in a search of 100% output of both legs and body and to shoot it into some proper stages.
Also have this impression. I think there was not a single moment when he did let go. And test himself on GC - thats what he was used to for years now. So why not of that gives him the most personally?I think finishing high on GC and stages mean the most to him. Just because looking at 11th overall doesn’t add much to his career when looking at it as a snapshot, it would mean a lot to him reaching that point when the last 2 years he was struggling and riding with the sprinters.
Wouldn't say he's top 25. We have to take into consideration both the riders who aren't racing the tour, and those who are but are sacrificing their own chances in support of their team leader.He is 25th in GC, now, apparently… That‘s very good. So he‘s back to the Top-25 of the world‘s best stage racers. I would not have expected that. There were times when I thought he would never again be in this Top-25.
If he defends 25th rank in GC until Paris, it was a great Tour for him. 25th in GC, 3rd in AdH - great results. Happy for Froomedog.![]()
Wouldn't say he's top 25. We have to take into consideration both the riders who aren't racing the tour, and those who are but are sacrificing their own chances in support of their team leader.