Re: Re:
I don't really agree with that. Lombardia isn't really comparable because it is so much longer and with significantly more climbing. Riders regularly blow up towards the end of it.
San Sebastian isn't long enough to make Valverde blow up - especially with him coming off the Tour de France in great condition. Purito could drop him on the steepest section of the climb (indeed, he did last year), but it won't be because Valverde has blown up, and so you would expect Valverde to eat back the time quickly in the closing kilometres.
Arredondo said:DFA123 said:bala v said:johnymax said:DFA123 said:It's difficult to see how Valverde doesn't win this, especially given his form. Although it looks like Movistar will have a fairly weak team (it seems like they are going to deliberately not pick any of their Basque riders), so hopefully that will encourage some attacks on the Jaizkibel.
I agree. I can see only two scenarios where Valverde could lose this. First is if a strong group of riders attack on Jaizkibel 55km from the finish or on Arkale 30km to go. The group must be well represented with lets say 7+ very strong riders. They need to work well together and build a nice gap and maybe they'd have some chances to get to the finish. The second scenario is if there's no that big of a selection on Bordako Tontorra and 6-7 or more riders regroup on the descent with no other Movistar rider. With some finisseur like attack, somebody could take a win from Valverde. Both are pretty unlikely though and I'd be surprised if Bala doesn't win.
And the third is that Purito could drop him on Bordako Tontorra and cruise to the finish. Not very high possibility, considering Bala's form in the Tour, but if anybody can do that, it's Purito
There's still about 3km of flat after the descent to the finish though. Bearing in mind that Purito is an awful time triallist and a worse descender than Valverde, he'd probably need to go over the top with a lead of around 40 seconds.
Just rewatch the final of Lombardia 2013. Purito got 10 seconds on Valverde at the top of Villa Vergano. After the descent, he had between 15 and 20 seconds. So he did a better descent then Piti. And on the flat section after that, Bala lost another 3 seconds (gap was 22 seconds between the two at one point).
So no way he needs 40 seconds. Come on, be real. If he drops Bala, it also means he's fresher. That means he will not lose too much time on the descent. It's not a computer game in the sense that in every situation, Bala will make up time on the descent and on the flat. It's all about form, legs and if you are dropped.
In every situation Purito will win this race, if he's got 15 seconds at the top of Bordako Tontorra.
I don't really agree with that. Lombardia isn't really comparable because it is so much longer and with significantly more climbing. Riders regularly blow up towards the end of it.
San Sebastian isn't long enough to make Valverde blow up - especially with him coming off the Tour de France in great condition. Purito could drop him on the steepest section of the climb (indeed, he did last year), but it won't be because Valverde has blown up, and so you would expect Valverde to eat back the time quickly in the closing kilometres.