Re:
Dekker_Tifosi said:
There was no way for Mollema to win except attacking on the last climb and hoping he'd stay solo. He did a big attack but Alaphilippe was the only one able to follow. So game over after that.
Mollema really good in this race each year. That's like his 7th top 10 in 7 years?
The critics from the couch potatoes here are pretty dumb again. What do you want him to do? He didn't do much/any work in the final km. The flat road was no place to attack. After the climb he had already gambled and lost. The worst thing to do would be throw away whatever result you had left
His only chance of a victory when Alaphilippe caught him was for them to get caught and then make a solo attack where the other fast riders would look at each other and not chase.
But you're right. He would never beat Alaphilippe in a two-up situation. His chances would have been better if the others had been closer, and Alaphilippe needed to work harder - but in that situation he should also have not contributed.
But of course - a second place in a WT race is a good result for him and I understand why he pulled. It must also be pretty embarrassing to not cooperate, get towed to the line and still be beaten comfortably in the sprint. But now that he has won the race before, I think he could have played a bit more for another victory instead of just handing it to Alaphilippe.
But he made a good attack and rode an overall good race. Redemption from the Tour, I would say.