[url=http://forum.cyclingnews.com/viewtopic.php?p=2236467#p2236467:2mry4rum][b:2mry4rum]pastronef[/b][/url] said:
[url=http://forum.cyclingnews.com/viewtopic.php?p=2236451#p2236451:2mry4rum][b:2mry4rum]fmk_RoI[/b][/url] said:
Those desperately clinging to the hope of a DCMS II to end their agony over seeing Sky surviving: hold your breath.
ghhghghgh
however damning and critical the DCMS report was on sky, it was a 1 week story at best; you two seriously think any posters, even here in the clinic are losing sleep over a possible DCMS II?? sky/DB's demise or survival is more likely to be decided in Disneys/other boardroom rather than at DCMS.
as i see it, the posters who are in serious denial & agony are the serial sky defenders whose blind denial and contortions of logic, (in the face of clear and open abuse of the rules and their own often stated ethics) are funny/tragic in equal proportions.