Re: Re:
I don't know why you quoted me, your post seems to have nothing to do with mine.
Tribunals are public, at the moment it's just as likely an application will be for part or all of it to be held in private. I assume this would also require legal arguments.
samhocking said:King Boonen said:MartinGT said:If he didnt have anything to hide, surly he would just show up. Clear his name and the name of Sky / BC.
If he does have something to hide, he will surly be under immense pressure from whoever are the guilty parties.
I don't think this is always true (there's a huge amount of evidence that it isn't) and I certainly don't think it's true for someone who suffers from mental health problems.
The MPTS chair said:
There is likely to be a further application on Friday morning which would require legal arguments and it may well be that they would be heard in private
It sounds like new evidence has come to light. Nothing to do with Freeman's health or not being there. In fact the chair also confirms:
Both parties - Freeman and the GMC - have been invited to submit documents to the tribunal panel, which will be read through on Thursday ahead of reconvening on Friday morning.
I don't know why you quoted me, your post seems to have nothing to do with mine.
Tribunals are public, at the moment it's just as likely an application will be for part or all of it to be held in private. I assume this would also require legal arguments.