This is going to make me sound like a real trainspotter, but as a Pantani fan, I've gotta write something ...
First off I was really pleased to see the profile on "Pantani's 1998 Tour and Giro winning bike". I thought it was a nice touch and a good way of showing respect to a great (albeit also tragic) rider of a past era by profiling his bike.
However after a read and a look at the photos, I am pretty disappointed as - based on what I have seen and read elsewhere (including a review of Pantani's bike in a 1998 or 1999 edition of ProCycling), that's not the bike he rode in those races. Or at least, if it was the bike, it has had some parts changed since then. It's the little things like:
- the carbon Ergo levers - every picture of Pantani in '98 has him with alloy levers, which isn't surprising since Campag didn't introduce carbon levers until '99;
- the 44 inner ring - when the other review had a 39 and most anything that I've read has him riding 39 inner rings;
- every picture I've seen of Pantani in the 98 Tour has him using red Time pedals (I realise that they're easily changed, but as the Bianchi museum is famous for having Coppi's bike complete with road dirt from his last race, the expectation is that they wouldn't change anything);
- I recall the ProCycling profile of his bike having it with 172.5 cranks, an unembroidered yellow seat and no nickname on the bike - I do have to say I'm not 100% on these details, but I have the magazine out in the shed and will dig it out some time over the next 24 hours to check (if anyone wants to call me on it ...)
So, my question is - what's the real story with the bike? Is it a Pantani replica? Has Bianchi put up another bike of his in their museum? Or has CN made a mistake??
Again, apologies for the geekiness, but I guess that I just feel that, if you're going to put up an article that is, by its very nature, partly a mark of respect to Pantani, it seems somehow disrespectful to his memory not to get the details right ...
First off I was really pleased to see the profile on "Pantani's 1998 Tour and Giro winning bike". I thought it was a nice touch and a good way of showing respect to a great (albeit also tragic) rider of a past era by profiling his bike.
However after a read and a look at the photos, I am pretty disappointed as - based on what I have seen and read elsewhere (including a review of Pantani's bike in a 1998 or 1999 edition of ProCycling), that's not the bike he rode in those races. Or at least, if it was the bike, it has had some parts changed since then. It's the little things like:
- the carbon Ergo levers - every picture of Pantani in '98 has him with alloy levers, which isn't surprising since Campag didn't introduce carbon levers until '99;
- the 44 inner ring - when the other review had a 39 and most anything that I've read has him riding 39 inner rings;
- every picture I've seen of Pantani in the 98 Tour has him using red Time pedals (I realise that they're easily changed, but as the Bianchi museum is famous for having Coppi's bike complete with road dirt from his last race, the expectation is that they wouldn't change anything);
- I recall the ProCycling profile of his bike having it with 172.5 cranks, an unembroidered yellow seat and no nickname on the bike - I do have to say I'm not 100% on these details, but I have the magazine out in the shed and will dig it out some time over the next 24 hours to check (if anyone wants to call me on it ...)
So, my question is - what's the real story with the bike? Is it a Pantani replica? Has Bianchi put up another bike of his in their museum? Or has CN made a mistake??
Again, apologies for the geekiness, but I guess that I just feel that, if you're going to put up an article that is, by its very nature, partly a mark of respect to Pantani, it seems somehow disrespectful to his memory not to get the details right ...