Just wondering regarding the whole Ryder hesjedal situation (and others like it)...if I was a pro cyclist who doped in the past, it is likely that at least a few people know for certain that I did. In this current day and age, I wouldn't be able to trust everyone who has knowledge of my doping to keep their mouths shut. Therefore, wouldn't it be better if I came clean prior to irrefutable information that proved I doped? Clearly pro cyclists have a lot to protect, but I just don't understand why we haven't seen many if at all admissions to doping. In the hesjedal situation (and o'grady and others) the public completely loses faith in the rider to tell the whole truth. Therefore, wouldn't it be better to be upfront, tell the truth, and avoid complete loss of integrity?
What are your thoughts, and why don't you think we see it more often?
What are your thoughts, and why don't you think we see it more often?