Re: Re:
"Frankly, it's immature elitism."
Bingo.
Oude Geuze summed up in one sentence what I've been trying to say all along.
There is no script to cycling commentary. The commentators aren't always on the same feed of the broadcaster, so they're trying to figure stuff out and interpret it in real time. That's not an easy thing to do.
Condemning a guy who doesn't fit the profile is typical of road racers in general.
There has always been a sense of elitism in the sport, and I can't figure out why.
Compared to Kirby, Sean Kelly is absolutely atrocious. Yet we don't hear much criticism of him. (Edited to say I like Sean Kelly, but he's nowhere near as good as Kirby in calling a race.)
Anyhow, carry on. I didn't come here to derail the thread. Apologies.
Oude Geuze said:Brullnux said:Firstly, this thread is made to mock stupid things commentators say rather than criticise their overall quality. There is already a thread for that.Oude Geuze said:A lot of people on this board dont understand that being a commentator is much more difficult than identifying the times when a commentator makes a mistake. You can choose when to speak, the commentator has to cover everything.
To make a simple analogy, if you're watching jeopardy at home and answer every question you know, you will seem smart to your friends. But you are selecting which questions to answer, which makes it a lot easier. None of you would even come close to doing what Kirby does, and most of you would not even dear to. Of course, any idiot could do what Sean Kelly does, which is keep quiet, until you feel you have something to say. Even if that happens to be the same thing you said previously. And the time before that.
Secondly, the "you couldn't do a better job" argument is one of the most useless ones in the world. So what I can't manage a coach a team as well as Mourinho? That isn't my job, I'm not paid to do it, I haven't been picked to do it - but I can spot terrible moments and terrible decisions, and I have every right to criticise then for it. I can't play football as well as John Stones yet I can still say that he's a bad defender. I can't play rugby as well as the Italian national team, but I can still call them useless. Criticising Kirby does not exclude respecting his role; it merely says that he is not good enough to do it. Who cares if I can't do as well? There are others who so the job and are better, and there will be more who don't do the job who have the potential to be better. It's not just a single mistake - I don't care if a commentator says that a rider is Jelle Wallays instead of Sean de Bie: the issue is with when he can't read races, doesn't know who riders are (even when their names are displayed) and struggle with the most basic arithmetic and logic. Repeatedly. At that point I'd say that he isn't good enough.
Lastly, the jeopardy analogy is off for the reasons I stated above.
Diversion over.
I replied that way exactly because such a claim was made by people itt as a way of disparaging Kirby. The comment I made does pertain to this subject, and it is valid. You state that he can't read races or remember names. I have seen hours worth of Kirby commentating, and that simply is not true. Norwegian and danish commentators are no better, they occasionally miss things. Also, you have to remember that we are not the target audience. We are an insignificant minority. His job is to entertain the majority, and he's really good at animating even dull races. So your critique of him is both wrong and a result of an uninformed view of what he is hired to do. Frankly, it's immature elitism.
"Frankly, it's immature elitism."
Bingo.
Oude Geuze summed up in one sentence what I've been trying to say all along.
There is no script to cycling commentary. The commentators aren't always on the same feed of the broadcaster, so they're trying to figure stuff out and interpret it in real time. That's not an easy thing to do.
Condemning a guy who doesn't fit the profile is typical of road racers in general.
There has always been a sense of elitism in the sport, and I can't figure out why.
Compared to Kirby, Sean Kelly is absolutely atrocious. Yet we don't hear much criticism of him. (Edited to say I like Sean Kelly, but he's nowhere near as good as Kirby in calling a race.)
Anyhow, carry on. I didn't come here to derail the thread. Apologies.