Comprehensive Climbers Ranking

[Netserk]

I do love my flat track mountain sprinter bully.

hence i do not think a power curve captures capacity

rogla has a great bazooka, lipowitz less so

ben o connor is an almost comical example and why the 2024 vuelta shows the limits of a too simple model

 

[Berniece]

@Peyresourde Why don't you throw all these analyses and your method in a website?

 

[Peyresourde]

Do you have any data from the glowing like molten lava golden age of the mythical Volta Portugal.

These are the 2 best performances I have from Portugal:

Raúl Alarcón | 78 (-4): 6.67 W/kg for 20:55 on Senhora de Graca (Portugal 2017)
José Neves | 75 (-12): 6.86 W/kg for 19:42 on Senhora de Graca Merendaz ITT (2021)

This level would certainly have been very competitive in the World Tour in the 2010s, but not to the extent that the Portuguese riders would have dominated.

@Peyresourde Why don't you throw all these analyses and your method in a website?

I have thought about it, but in the end I decided to just post some of my work on this forum for now.

 

[pablohidalgo7]

Valverde's 2 best Indexes are from 2004 and 2005, they do the heavy lifting. I think his ceiling on his very best day was a bit higher than Froome and Nibali, but overall he was definitely worse than Froome in the 2010s and maybe also worse than Nibali (though that is more debatable and more depending on the type of climb/stage).


I probably won't talk about Evenepoel anymore until there is new information. All in all, he has a consistent climbing ceiling that he reaches very inconsistently and is worse on steeper gradients. (Though the last 2 k of Ganda where he dropped everyone are steep).

I do not have the 2013 TT. It is a climb in 2 parts that is difficult to get right. I might calculate it in the future. On Lussari, the performances definitely were not that great, but it is also difficult to be certain with the rough surface and a descent.

Primoz Roglic | 80 (+1): 6.37 W/kg for 28:50 on Lussari ITT (Giro 2023)

The other riders Kuss (76), Thomas and Almeida (74) were not that good.

The (+1) adjustment results mainly from the way I adjust for regularity of climbs and I also gave a bonus point for the chain drop. Otherwise it would be a slight negative adjustment.

(To adjust for irregularities like extended flat sections and descents, I slighty adjust the watts up directly and also add bonus adjustments to the Index, as irregular climbs affect both the watt calculation and the pacing of the rider.)

It's curious how low the performances in Lussari were—well, in a manner of speaking, almost 6.4 w/kg for nearly half an hour after the two previous mountain marathons isn't that bad, but still... The thing is, Zeeman said it was one of Roglic's best days of his career (and it was understood he meant physically). I wonder if the rough asphalt you mentioned has a much bigger impact on the estimates than we imagine.

 

[tobydawq]

Primoz Roglic | 80 (+1): 6.37 W/kg for 28:50 on Lussari ITT (Giro 2023)

The other riders Kuss (76), Thomas and Almeida (74) were not that good.

What was the negative adjustment points for Thomas given the lunch break/picnic/helmet change he took at the bottom?

 

[Peyresourde]

It's curious how low the performances in Lussari were—well, in a manner of speaking, almost 6.4 w/kg for nearly half an hour after the two previous mountain marathons isn't that bad, but still... The thing is, Zeeman said it was one of Roglic's best days of his career (and it was understood he meant physically). I wonder if the rough asphalt you mentioned has a much bigger impact on the estimates than we imagine.

It is very possible that I underestimated the effort, but I really doubt ist was one of Roglic's best. he only gained 37 seconds on Thomas on a very steep 30 minute climb. Thomas never even once in his career did amzing raw watts.

The rough surface and a lot of rain ditches crossing the road where you have to pedal a bit carefully may make pushing power harder. And someone metioned before that it is physiologically more dificult to push power on very steep gradients. It was also one of the (rare) recent GTs where riders were really affected by fatigue, probably due to bad whether and crashes.

*Performances also were not that bad. In the 2023 Tour ITT, they were much worse (except for Vingegaard).

 

[pablohidalgo7]

It is very possible that I underestimated the effort, but I really doubt ist was one of Roglic's best. he only gained 37 seconds on Thomas on a very steep 30 minute climb. Thomas never even once in his career did amzing raw watts.

The rough surface and a lot of rain ditches crossing the road where you have to pedal a bit carefully may make pushing power harder. And someone metioned before that it is physiologically more dificult to push power on very steep gradients. It was also one of the (rare) recent GTs where riders were really affected by fatigue, probably due to bad whether and crashes.

Well with chain drop (was 19 or 21 seconds lost I think) it was more close to 55-1 min difference to Thomas and Almeida. And I was refering to all the estimations of that day and not only yours, but despite Zeeman claim t it´s quite posible that your last sentence is just the true and due to the cirscunstances it was more a mountain ITT of surviving than a day of pushing the big watts like other Roglic perfomances in that regard (Romandie 2018, Peraygues, ¿San Luca 2019?...)