Comprehensive Climbers Ranking

[Peyresourde]

I just checked it again and my times were mostly accurate. But I had Fabio Parra wrong, who was second fastest on the climb with 58:57, even three seconds faster than Lucho Herrera.

The difference in level between 1986 and 1987 is really crazy.

After checking some other performances again, Herreras climbing time in 1984 to La Ruchere was faster then Fignon, but he started seriously slow the first few kilometers.

 

[CyclistAbi]

I like it on how Rogla always seems to end up in there, historically speaking.

 

[Squire]

-Lipowitz had a very solid level in the Dauphine and Tour, generally in the mid 80 range. Slightly weaker than 2024 Evenepoel, but very competitive and he might still have a decent room for improvement.

Does that mean between 80 and 81 or between 80 and 90? Because if it's the former, he's way behind your average for Almeida and more like Enric Mas or Sepp Kuss. But I guess with such few data points he wouldn't be consistently between 80 and 81, so I guess it's probably the latter.

 

[Red Rick]

Does that mean between 80 and 81 or between 80 and 90? Because if it's the former, he's way behind your average for Almeida and more like Enric Mas or Sepp Kuss. But I guess with such few data points he wouldn't be consistently between 80 and 81, so I guess it's probably the latter.

Never even seen the former interpretation of "mid x number"