Comprehensive Climbers Ranking

Page 26 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Feb 20, 2012
55,761
47,233
28,180
I don't obsess over W/kg numbers. I look at relative performances like you, and then add the index of Peyresourde to inform my thinking.

The field in general is very bad. Only Martinez and Lipo who are decent climbers. 15-20 seconds on Lipowitz today is underwhelming imo. The rest of the field were riding tactical.

Agree with the bolded bit. Looking at it again, I can't really find a reason though other than the field is pretty weak and leadout was probably slow. Big group of average riders going far up the climb together.
Once again the absence of a MTF to judge the rest of the field because they're just chilling in their groups.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pozzovivo
Feb 7, 2026
291
490
1,630
I don't obsess over W/kg numbers. I look at relative performances like you, and then add the index of Peyresourde to inform my thinking.

The field in general is very bad. Only Martinez and Lipo who are decent climbers. 15-20 seconds on Lipowitz today is underwhelming imo. The rest of the field were riding tactical.

Agree with the bolded bit. Looking at it again, I can't really find a reason though other than the field is pretty weak and leadout was probably slow. Big group of average riders going far up the climb together.
Martinez is a unipuerto specialist.

The field is 'always bad'. Who are the good climbers right now (that are not injured)? Lipowitz is 4th best in the world and after that it is all bunched up. If you look at gaps, you also have to look at the length of the climb. 1 minute on a 20 minute climb is a lot (+the drafting differential). Lipowitz is clearly on good form.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pozzovivo
Feb 20, 2012
55,761
47,233
28,180
Martinez is a unipuerto specialist.

The field is 'always bad'. Who are the good climbers right now (that are not injured)? Lipowitz is 4th best in the world and after that it is all bunched up. If you look at gaps, you also have to look at the length of the climb. 1 minute on a 20 minute climb is a lot (+the drafting differential). Lipowitz is clearly on good form.
The one thing you often get in regards to gaps is groups further behind will not go at the max pace for the better riders in that group because they don't wanna isolate themselves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Peyresourde
Aug 13, 2024
1,001
1,069
5,680
Martinez is a unipuerto specialist.

The field is 'always bad'. Who are the good climbers right now (that are not injured)? Lipowitz is 4th best in the world and after that it is all bunched up. If you look at gaps, you also have to look at the length of the climb. 1 minute on a 20 minute climb is a lot (+the drafting differential). Lipowitz is clearly on good form.
Maybe that is his forte, but Martinez won the queen stage ahead of Almeida last year. That was hardly a unipuerto. Lenny boy was also good in Catalunya this year on attritional mtn stages.

I'm not sure I understand the "field is alway bad comment". I think races like Catalunya and Tirreno had much deeper fields of top climbers than this Romandie. Basque country on paper as well, although several dropped out. Imo, the strength of the field gives weight to the performances. The deeper the field, the more sure one can be that the winner did a really good performance. Maybe Lipo is in top shape and that is enough.

Agree with the bolded point of course. I recall Pogacar dropping lipowitz by 1 minute 20 seconds on a Combloux (20 min climb ish). 15 seconds today does not move me that much. Of course Pogacar will improve the next month, but this week was just way below my expecation.

If Seixas or top prep vingegaard was here - I think they have Pogacar beaten.

For reference, how good was Pogacar on Capegna in 22? Took one minute out of a really good field in spring.
 
Last edited:
Feb 20, 2012
55,761
47,233
28,180
Maybe that is his forte, but Martinez won the queen stage ahead of Almeida last year. That was a hardly a unipuerto.

I'm not sure I understand the "field is alway bad comment". I think races like Catalunya and Tirreno had much deeper fields of top climbers than this Romandie. Basque country on paper as well, although several dropped out. Imo, the strength of the field gives weight to the performances. The deeper the field, the more sure one can be that the winner did a really good performance. Maybe Lipo is in top shape and that is enough.

Agree with the bolded point of course. I recall Pogacar dropping lipowitz by 1 minute 20 seconds on a Combloux (20 min climb ish). 15 seconds today does not move me that much. Of course Pogacar will improve the next month, but this week was just way below my expecation.

If Seixas or top prep vingegaard was here - I think they have Pogacar beaten.

For reference, how good was Pogacar on Capegna in 22? Took one minute out of a really good field in spring.
Carpegna was like 6.5 for 20 with everyone else doing dreadful numbers because it was freezing rain
 
Aug 13, 2024
1,001
1,069
5,680
Carpegna was like 6.5 for 20 with everyone else doing dreadful numbers because it was freezing rain
No rain, but it was crazy cold that day, that's for sure. Still, it really was an elite field and big gaps between several groups. That performance stands out as much better than today's despite what the pure numbers say.

Pog in Catalunya 24', Vingegaard in Tirreno 24' and Basque 23', and Seixas this year, all impressed me more than Pogacar this Romandie.

I'm trying to summon some hope for a closer battle this summer.
 
Feb 7, 2026
291
490
1,630
Maybe that is his forte, but Martinez won the queen stage ahead of Almeida last year. That was a hardly a unipuerto.

I'm not sure I understand the "field is alway bad comment". I think races like Catalunya and Tirreno had much deeper fields of top climbers than this Romandie. Basque country on paper as well, although several dropped out. Imo, the strength of the field gives weight to the performances. The deeper the field, the more sure one can be that the winner did a really good performance. Maybe Lipo is in top shape and that is enough.

Agree with the bolded point of course. I recall Pogacar dropping lipowitz by 1 minute 20 seconds on a Combloux (20 min climb ish). 15 seconds today does not move me that much. Of course Pogacar will improve the next month, but this week was just way below my expecation.

If Seixas or top prep vingegaard was here - I think they have Pogacar beaten.

For reference, how good was Pogacar on Capegna in 22? Took one minute out of a really good field in spring.
Tadej Pogacar | 83 (+4): 6.69 W/kg for 18:45 on Carpegna (Tirreno 2022)

This was a really strong perfomance (especially for 2022 standards), the others that day were bad. A field can have strong names when you look at it in hindsight, at the time it was perceived as a showdown between Pogacar and Evenepoel only (even though he could not climb yet at that point in time).

Lipowitz today had the same Index as in Combloux, Poagacar was much worse of course. I also don't expect his summer shape to be better than the last 2 years, but the others still need to reach at least close to that level.

Vingegaard in Tour shape would be better than Pogacar today, but we have also not seen that shape yet this year. Seixas would have been together with Pogacar.

The depth of the field was maybe a bit better in Tirreno and Catalunya, but not by much. Paret-Peintre is also here (2nd-4th from Catalunya are here).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Pozzovivo
Feb 20, 2012
55,761
47,233
28,180
No rain, but it was crazy cold that day, that's for sure. Still, it really was an elite field and big gaps between several groups. That performance stands out as much better than today's despite what the pure numbers say.

Pog in Catalunya 24', Vingegaard in Tirreno 24' and Basque 23', and Seixas this year, all impressed me more than Pogacar this Romandie.

I'm trying to summon some hope for a closer battle this summer.
I think there's no predictive value to this Romandie other than potentially that Pogacar actually gets tired after a really big set of targets and therefor yoloing a Vuelta after a TdF later on is actually not that easy
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pozzovivo
Jul 7, 2013
9,300
16,464
23,180
But don't obsess over W/kg numbers, look at gaps behind. They are big despite the negative split.

And when nobody si doing great 20 minute numbers, then maybe conditions aren't as great as you'd think.

Lipo was holding on pretty well and also kept small gap behind Pog afterwards. I would say better Pogacar today ( than 3 days ago) but not his standard thermonuclear level. Unless we assume Lipo progressed so much that hes close to Pogs level now.
 
Feb 20, 2012
55,761
47,233
28,180
Lipo was holding on pretty well and also kept small gap behind Pog afterwards. I would say better Pogacar today ( than 3 days ago) but not his standard thermonuclear level. Unless we assume Lipo progressed so much that hes close to Pogs level now.
Lipowitz was dangling off Vingegaard/Pogacar a few times in the last TdF
 
Aug 13, 2024
1,001
1,069
5,680
Feb 25, 2026
271
262
930
So anemic leadout and quite strong attack seems to be the conclusion. The only remaining thing I'd like to know was whether Pogacar accelerated notably in the last km, or if Lipowitz had to slow down.

View: https://x.com/ammattipyoraily/status/2050688588245831939?s=20


View: https://x.com/ammattipyoraily/status/2050685619035144421?s=20
I'd say the first, he obviously went really hard to drop Lipowitz and make a gap
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pozzovivo