The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
slowspoke said:Just wondering and can't find any mention of, what actual level of hct is he allowed? And does any other rider have one? Apart from the Cobra of course!
Thanks,
Slowspoke
straydog said:A TUE is a therapeutic Exemption....it is only applicable to drugs that an athlete may be taking for medicinal purposes....not to having a high haematocrit.
That is is a dispensation.
And the 50% limit still exists. There has never been a ban in place for going over. Just a medical suspension until it falls back to acceptable parameters.
Cloxxki said:I know a master athlete who has one for like 53%. But he doesn't even want to go there, as due to an actual illness he can get in mortal danger, and has been before. Can't deal with extended altitude stays I believe, gets him gravely ill.
I wonder to which extent these kind of Hct TUE's pose an actual relative advantage over other athletes with a 50% limit, supposing both legally or illegally try and get it close as possible. Same for diabetics allowed to use all the insulin they feel they need (self-administering during races even) to safely make it to a finish line.
Tyler'sTwin said:Wrong.
10 char
Cloxxki said:Suppose I was a few years longer, and started "training" with a good (evil) doc early on. I'd get myself into some races, where my obviosul talent (charging) would be appreciated. I get myself some results, and the blood tests follow. Wow, this guy has a 53% Hct, pretty consistently! "Really? I didn't know, just noticed others were slower usually". So I get the dispensation. Happy career. Just need to keep boosting and not slack off in the off season with (un)expected bio passport tests waiting around every corner.
Who besides my doctor will even know that I have a natural Hct of 39%? I never was tested with such values ever, never under 50%. And I get SO faint when I start in the mountains too long, it just doesn't seem to work for me, so I don't. I can win a few summit finishes back to back, but that's stretching my luck.
Or I could move to Boulder or Kenya and just never get tested, because my country's ADA doesn't care, and my sports federation can't afford it. or the other wat around.
straydog said:Sorry buddy unless you can provide a link to where the 2 week suspension on "health grounds" has been chucked out by the UCI then I am going to have to suggest it is you who are wrong.
If a rider has a dispensation, such as Ricco did, that is different, but if they don't they get a two week "break", and further tests at the end of that period.
Nilsson said:You wouldn't pull it off to go from 39 to 53, and stay there, without your retics going through the roof and being shaky with an OFF-score that gives you a two year vacation - guaranteed...
Cloxxki said:Suppose I was a few years longer, and started "training" with a good (evil) doc early on. I'd get myself into some races, where my obviosul talent (charging) would be appreciated. I get myself some results, and the blood tests follow. Wow, this guy has a 53% Hct, pretty consistently! "Really? I didn't know, just noticed others were slower usually". So I get the dispensation. Happy career. Just need to keep boosting and not slack off in the off season with (un)expected bio passport tests waiting around every corner.
Who besides my doctor will even know that I have a natural Hct of 39%? I never was tested with such values ever, never under 50%. And I get SO faint when I start in the mountains too long, it just doesn't seem to work for me, so I don't. I can win a few summit finishes back to back, but that's stretching my luck.
Or I could move to Boulder or Kenya and just never get tested, because my country's ADA doesn't care, and my sports federation can't afford it. or the other wat around.
straydog said:A TUE is a therapeutic Exemption....it is only applicable to drugs that an athlete may be taking for medicinal purposes....not to having a high haematocrit.
That is is a dispensation.
And the 50% limit still exists. There has never been a ban in place for going over. Just a medical suspension until it falls back to acceptable parameters.
VeloGirl said:A baseline hematocrit level was established for Contador, though. He didn't just get one bloodtest and say "see, that's my natural level"
"Because Contador had previously applied to the UCI for an exemption for high haematocrit, during 2006 he had spent several days at the Lausanne antidoping laboratory who collected some very carefully controlled blood tests. Those data were obviously considered to be reliable - Contador had been granted an exemption based on the validity of those data thus it would be very difficult for him to turn around and suggest those data could not be relied upon."
http://nyvelocity.com/content/interviews/2012/behind-scenes-contador-cas-hearing-michael-ashenden