Is there any way of searching Twitter for questions that were posted and not answered?
I posted a question and I couldn't find it anywhere....
I posted a question and I couldn't find it anywhere....
heart_attack_man said:Is there any way of searching Twitter for questions that were posted and not answered?
I posted a question and I couldn't find it anywhere....
heart_attack_man said:Is there any way of searching Twitter for questions that were posted and not answered?
I posted a question and I couldn't find it anywhere....
heart_attack_man said:The way that Cookson engaged this afternoon was the lightest-touch, most stage-managed thing ever, so for JV to be applauding that, then I can see The Sceptic's point.
He did NOT even address ANY of the difficult questions.
I was personally appalled at Cookson's light-hearted Q&A. Lots of serious questions, not many serious answers.
I don't see the link between suggesting that JV was on the bandwagon and a "Hoggism". I think you're drawing a long bow, personally.
thehog said:Good to see Lance asked a question.
mewmewmew13 said:it sounds like he is only concerned about getting his @ss out of a lifetime ban
...am I correct in thinking this?![]()
Dr. Maserati said:But when JV tweeted it was very early in the session.
You are quite correct in that Cookson deflected and went to sound bytes, but that was only apparent when it was finished.
ChewbaccaD said:I think everything is centered on ending that ban now. He thought that somehow he was the Teflon Don right up until the ax fell, and didn't think he needed to do anything. Now he realizes the errors of his ways. He shouldn't have told the USADA to fu*k off, but he did. I think he gave up information on Pat because he thought he would get protection from the UCI and he didn't.
In all honesty, I don't know that I can fault him too much for trying to get his ban reduced. He isn't Floyd who can walk away because he really appears to just like riding his bike. Armstrong does everything to compete. It is who he is. I don't know that is the most onerous thing in the world. His real flaw in all of that is the ruthlessness he employs to win. That is the thing that needs to change.
Heckler said:Nice work, Beech Mtn.
mewmewmew13 said:it sounds like he is only concerned about getting his @ss out of a lifetime ban
...am I correct in thinking this?![]()
It won't.ChewbaccaD said:That is the thing that needs to change.
heart_attack_man said:+10000000
Thanks for all that. I had no idea how to sort out the searching properly, but good work!!!
ChewbaccaD said:Yea, because he doesn't have any more skin in the game than anyone else...
If you'd been sued by the UCI for telling the truth, I think maybe you'd ask the question also...
Cookson was hesitant to answer the queries directly "because they involve legal actions which are still live" but said that he was committed to providing answers as soon as he was able.
"What I can say as a general point, is that the UCI has expended too much time, resource and money fighting battles which have distracted it from far bigger problems – in particular doping," Cookson wrote.
"I can also say that if I am elected in September, the UCI will not use the courts to silence whistle-blowers, journalists or other dissenting voices. This is not to say we would not seek to communicate our own point of view or correct inaccuracies or unbalanced comment when appropriate but I am a firm believer in freedom of debate as being good for the long-term health of any sport."
thehog said:I believe not.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/cycling/22997066
Lance knows Cookson is going nowhere with T&R.
Cookson signed off on the Landis suit.
You think he wants T&R?
For once Lance is right.
The reason Lance could kick everyone around was because he knew the UCi would back him. That he could never test positive. The UCI management committee is as much to blame for what happened in cycling as is Armstrong.
Why all this moralising from the management committee? It's their heist along with Hein and Pat.
If elected President I will rapidly
establish a completely independent
anti-doping unit in cooperation with
WADA, managed and governed
outside of the UCI, so that people
can have absolute confidence in
our sport. It would be physically
and politically separate from the
UCI, responsible for all aspects of
anti doping, and report to a board
totally independent from the UCI.
This is something that I commit to
having in place in the first year of my
Presidency.
JimmyFingers said:He's saying the same thing many here have said.
But then he's got little credibility here.
The operations and status of the UCI’s Global Cycling Promotion
(GCP) unit, which has developed the Tour of Beijing, are unclear even to
those within the UCI. I will ensure absolute transparency of its purpose
and function and will eliminate GCP’s conflicts of interest with other race
promoters. Its focus should shift to elevating existing and new races
around the world. This can be done by providing development capital
and expertise in a way that shares the benefits equitably with the
independent organisers and national federations.
We must also help professional teams, their employees, and
athletes by structuring a system that promotes long term financial
stability. Business principles must be embraced to help teams secure
long term investment that will make for a healthier employment
environment. A more stable economic environment will also help
us promote strong ethical standards.