How hypocritical is the CPA asking the French Senate not to release names of riders from the 1998 TdF that showed positive because
"The list would not be reliable, the group claimed, as, for example, the tests were performed years ago, and laboratory conditions have changed in the interim. “Under these conditions the results are absolutely not guaranteed and it is impossible to guarantee the absence of errors including the nominative assignment.”?
Regardless of what anyone thinks about Armstrong, the CPA was more than happy to crucify him and continue to do so. I am not supporting Armstrong but pointing out the total hypocrisy. I am starting to firmly believe that there are no orginizations or committees in cycling that truly want to help the sport or the riders.
"The list would not be reliable, the group claimed, as, for example, the tests were performed years ago, and laboratory conditions have changed in the interim. “Under these conditions the results are absolutely not guaranteed and it is impossible to guarantee the absence of errors including the nominative assignment.”?
Regardless of what anyone thinks about Armstrong, the CPA was more than happy to crucify him and continue to do so. I am not supporting Armstrong but pointing out the total hypocrisy. I am starting to firmly believe that there are no orginizations or committees in cycling that truly want to help the sport or the riders.