Estela Domínguez, daughter of former pro Juan Carlos, who was just about to start her first senior road season with Sopela, has been killed by a truck during training. The driver fled the scene, and I don't know if he's been found yet.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
It's always the training on the road. There are such few serious injuries from races and so many from accidents with cars.
photo of the year?
What the heck happened today in Portugal.
Pidcock nearly mowed down after the finish by traffic on roundabout.
Someone made a serious error.
I mean a lot of these sprints were quite dicey and nervous to watch. Wouldn't say safe, but luckily no big crashes.
Where are you counting crashes, the final straight, the last km, or inside the final 3 kms?That's 8 full, massive WT bunch sprints so far this season and only one tiny crash involving three riders, two days ago in PN.
Where are you counting crashes, the final straight, the last km, or inside the final 3 kms?
UCI to investigate massive Tour of Flanders crash, road-blocking team tactics
'We want to set an example' says UCI officialwww.cyclingnews.com
Looks like the governing bodies are starting to take safety more seriously.
In regards to the stance "We want to set an example". This shows such considerations are in infancy. As in my opinion this is a bad approach. Trying to set an example. What you should be doing instead is constantly keeping an eye on things and try to implement sensible solutions to prevent such incidents in the future. Setting an example is usually a more populist move. When you admit i haven't taken this seriously so far. But now i will set an example to show how committed i am. Well.
Still it's i guess a start.
In regards to the stance "We want to set an example". This shows such considerations are in infancy. As in my opinion this is a bad approach. Trying to set an example. What you should be doing instead is constantly keeping an eye on things and try to implement sensible solutions to prevent such incidents in the future. Setting an example is usually a more populist move. When you admit i haven't taken this seriously so far. But now i will set an example to show how committed i am. Well.
to be fair, crashes rarely happen on a "single file" type of finish like this, where the peloton is stretched out and it's impossible to pass.As has been pointed out in the Basque Thread; that finale today doesn't exactly scream "We care about safety!"
Is it realistic to put down barriers on all these type of places on a 270km parcours? Not sure about that. It's not like Flanders Classics isn't already doing a whole lot to make the course safer with the Boplan pillars for example. At some point crashes are the riders' fault and not the parcours'.Regarding the Maciejuk crash:
I've actually been speculating how the situation might have been different if there had been barriers just by that grass patch.
Sure, he would still have been on the wrong side, but maybe instead of torpedoing the peloton, he would have hit the barriers, fallen into a puddle, and maybe looked a bit silly.
Of course, that would require the barriers to not just fall over.
Is it realistic to put down barriers on all these type of places on a 270km parcours? Not sure about that. It's not like Flanders Classics isn't already doing a whole lot to make the course safer with the Boplan pillars for example. At some point crashes are the riders' fault and not the parcours'.
RhD always requires organisers to be able to predict the future.