[=Alphabet;1093822]Be fair, he's far better than Gayle or Pollard, guys who actively refuse to play for their country in order to participate for the IPL. He's never, as far as I know, skived off a Sri Lanka ODI match to play a T20, which for me automatically means he's rated above the others.
He had a serious knee injury a few years back that forced him to stop playing tests for a while, and if I remember correctly, he made a brief comeback to tests but broke down mid-test and announced his retirement shortly after.
Here's what he has to say:
.
And his failure to execute under pressure situations isn't really a reason to call him a mercenary who doesn't care. He's not the first nor will he be the last cricketer to have a poor big match temperament.[/QUOTE]
It is correct that he had a knee injury, but his decision to retire from test cricket was taken hastily when the T20 Champions league was around the corner and after he signed a contract with SLC for a high value on the understanding that he would be available for test cricket.
This is why most Sri Lankans are suspicious about his intentions
He does have the big match temperament for Mumbai Indians though
His lack of effort on the field also irritates us. I remember him being booed by our own supporters for his lack of effort on the field in the World T 20 SF, a rare sight.
Alphabet said:
And you can see it right in front of you. It's no coincidence that India and Sri Lanka have declined since the IPL started, while ****stan, who haven't been allowed to play in the IPL, have actually improved their test team by a vast margin. They're comfortably the best Asian team and it's all because their youngsters don't get their heads turned by Indian rupees.
I
I was thinking this to myself when watching the test earlier today. There appears to be little talent coming through in Sri Lanka, either with the bat or ball. You look at the key men of this team and they're all around 35- Dilshan, Jayawardene, Sangakkara, Herath. All of them, Herath aside, distinguished themselves as special cricketers in their youth, while none of the Sri Lankan youngsters expect maybe Mathews seems to have done so.:
t's a blessing in disguise for the pak istani's that their cricketers are ignored in the IPL. They will always be a force in cricket due to their never ending line of talented fast bowlers. War and political instability should be their main concern.
Sadly for us our board is in a financial mess and needs India to survive, so we'll always make our players available to IPL specially at the cost of test cricket.
In fact we postponed the series against SA because of the IPL.
What country on earth would postpone a series against the world No 1 at home?

Jayawardena and Sanga who say to the media that test cricket is the pinnacle of the sport are quite happy about the postponement too.

Mahela was an outstanding schoolboy cricketer and Herath made his test debut aged 20, however Sanga wasn't too highly rated as a schoolboy cricketer even though was a fringe member of the u 19 cricket team and Dilshan played for an outstation school and was a late bloomer. He wasn't a regular until after the 2003 WC when he was about 27 and he really become a Vital player only after turning 30.
Your observation is true for the WC winning generation though. Aravinda, Arjuna, Gurusinghe , Mahanama and Murali were all outstanding school cricketers.
We don't see that caliber school cricketers now, specially batsmen.
However Chandimal, Thirimanna and Dimuth karunarathne are promising batsmen under 23 yrs of age whose test avenues are blocked by the big 3.
Regarding fast bowlers we seem to have better luck with finding softball cricketers outside the school cricket system rather than within it.
Malinga, Suranga lakmal, Nuwan pradeep are such players however they aren't able to stay on the park.
As for spinners it's not easy to replace Murali but there are a couple of promising u19s.
The biggest worry is captaincy. I shudder at the prospect of a Mathews captaincy. Thirimanna seems to be the most suited but he's still only 22, also needs more time.
QUOTE
If it makes you feel better, your fierce rivals India aren't going to be much better off, and you'll always be better than the West Indies, Zimbabwe, Bangladesh and New Zealand
:[/QUOTE]
The worst thing is, our current team always loses to India. It's a far cry from the days of Jayasuriya and Aravinda when we always beat them.
In fact it's a common joke here that whenever the Indians want a moral booster they arrange a series with us to prop up their rankings.
Sanga and Mahela are vastly overrated by the Western media.
They may have superior stats but I'd rather have Aravinda & Arjuna/Jayasuriya over Sanga & Mahela any-day to win a match.