- Aug 13, 2009
- 12,855
- 1
- 0
It is interesting to see how Damsgaard's opinion changes depending on if the rider is paying his salary or not.
Here are Rasmussen's values from 2007
Michael Rasmussen, 05.07.2007 - 40,3 Hct
Michael Rasmussen, 17.07.2007 - 43,1 Hct
Michael Rasmussen, 24.07.2007 - 43,9 Hct
Damsgaard's opinion at the time
http://paris.thover.com/story.php?l=en&ID=70
"Rasmussen did have a blood transfusion during the Tour or followed an EPO cure just before the Tour. Damsgaard says the increase of 3.6% in his hematocrit value and 1,1 gram per deciliter for his hemoglobin value is 'suspect', 'physiologically impossible' and scientifically impossible to explain in another way than that Rasmussen used doping"
Funny how he is not so certain when it comes to Armstrong.
Here are Rasmussen's values from 2007
Michael Rasmussen, 05.07.2007 - 40,3 Hct
Michael Rasmussen, 17.07.2007 - 43,1 Hct
Michael Rasmussen, 24.07.2007 - 43,9 Hct
Damsgaard's opinion at the time
http://paris.thover.com/story.php?l=en&ID=70
"Rasmussen did have a blood transfusion during the Tour or followed an EPO cure just before the Tour. Damsgaard says the increase of 3.6% in his hematocrit value and 1,1 gram per deciliter for his hemoglobin value is 'suspect', 'physiologically impossible' and scientifically impossible to explain in another way than that Rasmussen used doping"
Funny how he is not so certain when it comes to Armstrong.