del1962 said:Why should something that increases the risk of psychosis that is not currently legal be made legal?
Because the violence that surrounds the trade is worse than the risks of making it legal
del1962 said:Why should something that increases the risk of psychosis that is not currently legal be made legal?
Dear Wiggo said:Exactly. When I have a theory, I specifically say: Theory: <insert theory here>
I think it's ironic that the person (D Webster) tipping or trying to tip-off alleged drug-using professional cyclists (eg Sutton) gets pinged for drug use via a tip-off.
Just like it was ironic that Bassons got pinged for missing a doping control.
And that other doping tip off dude got crushed to death between a car and a closed garage door.
Vocal anti-doping advocates are getting slapped around.
Kinda helpful for omerta, don't you think?
My friend started working for the police yesterday. Sounds like if we can track your cn account to an address he'd be in for a succesful first week on the jobJimmyFingers said:The plants do smell, in fact they reek, in particularly the newer, ultra-strong strains that are very high in Htc. Other giveaways are the high use of electricity for the lights and the various hydroponic (?) gubbins.
del1962 said:Why should something that increases the risk of psychosis that is not currently legal be made legal?
del1962 said:Why should something that increases the risk of psychosis that is not currently legal be made legal?
andy1234 said:Regardless of your views on Cannabis regulation, it is ironic that someone so vocal about the breaking of sporting laws, doesn't appear so concerned about criminal laws. The peloton is full of riders who don't believe certain rules and regulations need to apply to them, this is no different.
andy1234 said:Regardless of your views on Cannabis regulation, it is ironic that someone so vocal about the breaking of sporting laws, doesn't appear so concerned about criminal laws. The peloton is full of riders who don't believe certain rules and regulations need to apply to them, this is no different.
ChewbaccaD said:Listening to you Sky fanboys go on and on increases the risk of psychosis, but nobody is trying to make that illegal.
Cheers Darryl! Good luck. While I no longer partake, with my exposure to people with health issues that are improved through cannabis use, I fully support its legalization.
Any person who drinks (a depressant) and thinks the use of marijuana is worse subscribes to an idiotic proposition.
del1962 said:Pathetic, rather than look at the problems with Cannobis you just choose some cheap skyfanboy jibe.
Darryl Webster said:Hi peeps. Few facts here. Only 9 plants were in flower. The remainder were small in grow stage. Any one who gardens will know you sow more than you require because you cannot be certain they will be succesful.
I have a very long and well documented, with my GP, Cannabis use to control my extreme anxiety, depressions and suicidal tendancies.
I refuse to use presciption anti depressents due to having on two occasions arrived at A@ E unconsious and close to death following over doses of presciption meds. Many anti depressents actual carry a increased risk of suicide warning in there guidance notes.
There is NO such risk with Cannabis.
My charge is purely for cultivation , NOT supply or intention to supply.
The POTENTIAL value figures given are, as is common , grosely exaggerated and If you use the home office,s own guidlines on quantity produced per plant ( 40grams) you reach a figure of much less than half and thats if EVERY plant was flowered. That there were two address,s was a personal circumstances situation, closing one while opening another ..a transition situation.
This " bust" occured last June, I have co operated from the onset. Despite that I spent 9 months on bail without charge contrary to home office guidlines that state 6 months should be the maxiumum without charge.
My stance on medicinal Cannabis has NO bearing whatsoever on my critisism of PED,s. They are entirely differant topics.
I do not expect everyone to understand or even to try to understand , to those that do, thank you .
del1962 said:Pathetic, rather than look at the problems with Cannobis you just choose some cheap skyfanboy jibe.
The Hitch said:Allow Tondo. That's some kgb **** going through your head there. They rig a garage door to crush him because he broke up an amateur ring? Or was he wearing a wire in training sessions with valverde?
Darryl Webster said:Hi peeps. Few facts here. Only 9 plants were in flower. The remainder were small in grow stage. Any one who gardens will know you sow more than you require because you cannot be certain they will be succesful.
I have a very long and well documented, with my GP, Cannabis use to control my extreme anxiety, depressions and suicidal tendancies.
I refuse to use presciption anti depressents due to having on two occasions arrived at A@ E unconsious and close to death following over doses of presciption meds. Many anti depressents actual carry a increased risk of suicide warning in there guidance notes.
There is NO such risk with Cannabis.
My charge is purely for cultivation , NOT supply or intention to supply.
The POTENTIAL value figures given are, as is common , grosely exaggerated and If you use the home office,s own guidlines on quantity produced per plant ( 40grams) you reach a figure of much less than half and thats if EVERY plant was flowered. That there were two address,s was a personal circumstances situation, closing one while opening another ..a transition situation.
This " bust" occured last June, I have co operated from the onset. Despite that I spent 9 months on bail without charge contrary to home office guidlines that state 6 months should be the maxiumum without charge.
My stance on medicinal Cannabis has NO bearing whatsoever on my critisism of PED,s. They are entirely differant topics.
I do not expect everyone to understand or even to try to understand , to those that do, thank you .
ChewbaccaD said:Regardless of your views on Cannabis regulation, it is ironic that someone who supported an obvious doping freak for 14 years appears so concerned about someone using Cannabis for medical purposes. This forum was full of sycophants who didn't believe certain rules and regulations applied to their hero, but now want to recriminate someone who is critical of their cherished fraud.
Catwhoorg said:The other possible culprit is the electricity being disproportionate to the house size and number of inhabitants.
The electric companies have provided this intelligence in the past.
Catwhoorg said:The other possible culprit is the electricity being disproportionate to the house size and number of inhabitants.
The electric companies have provided this intelligence in the past.
It's not about a former pro that has doped or used PEDs, but about breaking the law.hrotha said:Why? This involves a former pro.
Better move the Oscar Pistorius thread then.Netserk said:It's not about a former pro that has doped or used PEDs, but about breaking the law.
You are right.hrotha said:Better move the Oscar Pistorius thread then.
andy1234 said:I wondered how long it would take someone to link this to Armstrong.
You win the prize, you special, special person.