- Sep 25, 2009
- 7,527
- 1
- 0
i was refeering to the short=unfortunate time elapsed between an athlete administering the drug and the time he gets tested. in david's case (if my hypothesis of hes-bound epo is correct) it would imply about 24-48 hours as that's about the detection window for both hes and epo though it would greatly depend on the dose (an unknown) and the molecular weight of hes (there are several variants).L'arriviste said:python, but when you talk about 'unfortunate timing', can you elaborate on that? Do you mean simply that the test was introduced at an "unfortunate" moment for DGD and EM or is there some chemical half-life issue involved?
as to the detectability of hes-bound epo, my understanding is it was slightly after the cera test.
ps. you properly picked on my other implicit point - if indeed it was hes-epo,
david garcia may be telling the truth that he had no idea about hes. even his dealer may have been chemically naive. the rest of david garcia story is certainly bogus.