- Jul 25, 2011
- 2,007
- 1
- 0
Kwibus said:I doubt it.
He will lose all the minimal gains![]()
+1 And that's the reason why he renew 3 years with Sky
Kwibus said:I doubt it.
He will lose all the minimal gains![]()
Pippo_San said:As I stated before, it's like Sky is playing racist, just like they want the pure British breed to win the Tour for the first time.
What they did during this Tour really vilify the entire sport.
ferryman said:Mods. If you think this deserves to be in the stage 17 thread please feel free to delete.
But, really, have you ever seen such an open display of contempt by a rider for his Captain? Sky have secured 1-2 but I don't think it will be a happy dining room tonight. Just a pity there isn't another mountain stage tomorrow where things could have got really interesting![]()
Apollonius said:It's awful how nationalistic cycling is becoming. To many it doesn't matter the nationality of their favourite cyclists or even care if the winner comes from Antarctica but the bickering and racism coming from all camps these last few years has been awful.
Spanish, British and Australian fans & media are dragging the sport through the dirt, it's getting to be as bad as soccer.
When was cycling NOT nationalistic?Apollonius said:It's awful how nationalistic cycling is becoming.
Apollonius said:It's awful how nationalistic cycling is becoming. To many it doesn't matter the nationality of their favourite cyclists or even care if the winner comes from Antarctica but the bickering and racism coming from all camps these last few years has been awful.
Spanish, British and Australian fans & media are dragging the sport through the dirt, it's getting to be as bad as soccer.
Mellow Velo said:Objectivity and intelligent debate seems to be a thing of the past around here and the reason so many have left the racing forum, for greener pastures.
The Tour is not just about the climbs, and Wigans has been stronger in the ITTs so far, and on certain climbs has actually looked better than Froome. I wouldn't say Froome was definitely stronger without having seen them go on an actual duel. All we saw is that Froome has a better acceleration.Carols said:Well Froome definitely let the World know he could have dropped Wiggins at any time in 2 stages.....but he didn't leave him he went back or waited.
So on one hand his show of strength was disrespectful and leaves us saying 'wow had Froome been allowed to ride he might have won this race.' I think he Was the strongest in the race and would have won had he been unshackled.
On the other hand the Way he waited didn't show respect for his leader.
But this is cycling and the Strongest is always the most respected. El Pistolero said: 'The only hierarchy in cycling is that of the strongest.'
There is no doubt in my mind who is strongest in this race and it isn't Wiggo...
Forunculo said:A correct threadI can't remember a yellow jersey humillated by a teammate like this current edition
hrotha said:The Tour is not just about the climbs, and Wigans has been stronger in the ITTs so far, and on certain climbs has actually looked better than Froome. I wouldn't say Froome was definitely stronger without having seen them go on an actual duel. All we saw is that Froome has a better acceleration.
Between this and his comments towards Nibali, Froome is revealing himself to be a cocky ****.
Dr.Sahl said:Indeed, its become super nationalistic in some areas.. All the British I know cheer for Sky and Wiggins 100%... its odd..
Personaly, I love the Riders with a good personality and great riding.. I could name Jens as one.
hrotha said:The Tour is not just about the climbs, and Wigans has been stronger in the ITTs so far, and on certain climbs has actually looked better than Froome. I wouldn't say Froome was definitely stronger without having seen them go on an actual duel. All we saw is that Froome has a better acceleration.
Between this and his comments towards Nibali, Froome is revealing himself to be a cocky ****.
jilbiker said:Yes, it was a show of "I am better than you, I am gifting you this championship" . Disgraceful. It is better if Froome rode away. I think the "talk" they were having was more of an argument with a "smile". Wiggins felt really humiliated.
jilbiker said:Froome is an African with a British passport. Next time Froome fly the Kenyan or South African flag...Sky will never never ride for you. Rogers, Portier ride for you??? You got to be kidding
Dr.Sahl said:I think its a disgraceful tour in terms of sky, its totaly disrespectful to just do nothing to win the jersey when you are so much stronger.. but I suspect they might have something on Froome, why else would he let his only real chance of a tour win slide like this, there is no way any of these two will win with AC/AS and more MTF
Zinoviev Letter said:I can't really blame for Froome for making it clear to the world that he's the strongest. He signed up to ride for Wiggins, presumably for a lot of money. He has done his job, ensuring that Wiggins win the Tour. But nobody says that he has to like giving a Tour away, and it's only human to want to demonstrate your superiority from time to time.