Dear all,
I just bought one called "Planète Cyclisme" for 6 € the other day and after having read it I remembered why I rarely ever buy magazines about professional cycling (I'm not talking about magazines that focus on bikes and gear).
For one, I always find they are quite expensive for what they are. I mean I am absolutely willing to pay a certain price for quality journalism but I often find the stories that they bring have very little content and are badly written. At least this "Planète Cyclisme" didn't really have any interesting stories and appeared to have been written by a fourth-grader.
These magazines usually do have pretty nice pictures but we can also see those an hour after the race on cyclingnews.com for free.
And then the biggest problem I guess of these magazines is that they usually come out once a month and are therefore not up to date at all. I know there's nothing really they can do about that but it just seems to be that it's a waste of money to spend 6 € on a magazine that tells me there could be a chance that Wiggins moves to Sky when the decision has long been taken.
I don't know - maybe this was just a particularly bad example of a cycling magazine. But I think I will continue to only buy them when there is a feature about one of my absolute favorite riders in it.
I just bought one called "Planète Cyclisme" for 6 € the other day and after having read it I remembered why I rarely ever buy magazines about professional cycling (I'm not talking about magazines that focus on bikes and gear).
For one, I always find they are quite expensive for what they are. I mean I am absolutely willing to pay a certain price for quality journalism but I often find the stories that they bring have very little content and are badly written. At least this "Planète Cyclisme" didn't really have any interesting stories and appeared to have been written by a fourth-grader.
These magazines usually do have pretty nice pictures but we can also see those an hour after the race on cyclingnews.com for free.
And then the biggest problem I guess of these magazines is that they usually come out once a month and are therefore not up to date at all. I know there's nothing really they can do about that but it just seems to be that it's a waste of money to spend 6 € on a magazine that tells me there could be a chance that Wiggins moves to Sky when the decision has long been taken.
I don't know - maybe this was just a particularly bad example of a cycling magazine. But I think I will continue to only buy them when there is a feature about one of my absolute favorite riders in it.