Good thing it isn't only the Russians that are doping...BullsFan22 said:You really have to wonder about Dahlmeier. Every year, multiple times per year, she gets sick, misses training, misses racing and then magically appears to make podiums. If it happens once or twice, ok, but this much? Not normal...
Yes, the German Wunderhamster always coming out of hibernation at the right time and always being sick is getting a bit comical.frenchfry said:Good thing it isn't only the Russians that are doping...BullsFan22 said:You really have to wonder about Dahlmeier. Every year, multiple times per year, she gets sick, misses training, misses racing and then magically appears to make podiums. If it happens once or twice, ok, but this much? Not normal...
frenchfry said:Good thing it isn't only the Russians that are doping...BullsFan22 said:You really have to wonder about Dahlmeier. Every year, multiple times per year, she gets sick, misses training, misses racing and then magically appears to make podiums. If it happens once or twice, ok, but this much? Not normal...
Mayomaniac said:Yes, the German Wunderhamster always coming out of hibernation at the right time and always being sick is getting a bit comical.frenchfry said:Good thing it isn't only the Russians that are doping...BullsFan22 said:You really have to wonder about Dahlmeier. Every year, multiple times per year, she gets sick, misses training, misses racing and then magically appears to make podiums. If it happens once or twice, ok, but this much? Not normal...
BullsFan22 said:frenchfry said:Good thing it isn't only the Russians that are doping...BullsFan22 said:You really have to wonder about Dahlmeier. Every year, multiple times per year, she gets sick, misses training, misses racing and then magically appears to make podiums. If it happens once or twice, ok, but this much? Not normal...
Either the Russians have the worst doping mechanisms and tools/and are talentless or the ones at the top have everything going for them.
Boe and Loginov raced together in the juniors. They were neck and neck, as they have been so far this season (with Boe obviously coming out on top most of the time). Loginov was caught in November 2013, served his ban and now is skiing better than ever. This is about where one expects both of them to be, consistently. If Loginov can fix a couple things and gain some more confidence, he'll start winning.
Point is, if Loginov is still doping, then what is Boe on? There is no way one of them isn't doping when the other one is.
ps, I get your sacrasm
roundabout said:BullsFan22 said:frenchfry said:Good thing it isn't only the Russians that are doping...BullsFan22 said:You really have to wonder about Dahlmeier. Every year, multiple times per year, she gets sick, misses training, misses racing and then magically appears to make podiums. If it happens once or twice, ok, but this much? Not normal...
Either the Russians have the worst doping mechanisms and tools/and are talentless or the ones at the top have everything going for them.
Boe and Loginov raced together in the juniors. They were neck and neck, as they have been so far this season (with Boe obviously coming out on top most of the time). Loginov was caught in November 2013, served his ban and now is skiing better than ever. This is about where one expects both of them to be, consistently. If Loginov can fix a couple things and gain some more confidence, he'll start winning.
Point is, if Loginov is still doping, then what is Boe on? There is no way one of them isn't doping when the other one is.
ps, I get your sacrasm
I am sure that everyone who have ever beaten Ramon Carretero must have been doping as well...
This is an excellent question! Acknowledging that Russians have a deeply rooted and ongoing doping culture is in no way suggesting that the Norwegians (or others) are clean. Quite the contrary - a hit of ventolin anybody, athsma optional!BullsFan22 said:frenchfry said:Good thing it isn't only the Russians that are doping...BullsFan22 said:You really have to wonder about Dahlmeier. Every year, multiple times per year, she gets sick, misses training, misses racing and then magically appears to make podiums. If it happens once or twice, ok, but this much? Not normal...
Either the Russians have the worst doping mechanisms and tools/and are talentless or the ones at the top have everything going for them.
Boe and Loginov raced together in the juniors. They were neck and neck, as they have been so far this season (with Boe obviously coming out on top most of the time). Loginov was caught in November 2013, served his ban and now is skiing better than ever. This is about where one expects both of them to be, consistently. If Loginov can fix a couple things and gain some more confidence, he'll start winning.
Point is, if Loginov is still doping, then what is Boe on? There is no way one of them isn't doping when the other one is.
ps, I get your sacrasm
@Bullsfanwhy have you omitted eventuality Loginov isn' doping anymore? That would make sense actually. Boe and Loginov were, as you say, neck and neck, then Loginov was caught so he isn't doping anymore = logicaly Boe is now better.BullsFan22 said:frenchfry said:Good thing it isn't only the Russians that are doping...BullsFan22 said:You really have to wonder about Dahlmeier. Every year, multiple times per year, she gets sick, misses training, misses racing and then magically appears to make podiums. If it happens once or twice, ok, but this much? Not normal...
Either the Russians have the worst doping mechanisms and tools/and are talentless or the ones at the top have everything going for them.
Boe and Loginov raced together in the juniors. They were neck and neck, as they have been so far this season (with Boe obviously coming out on top most of the time). Loginov was caught in November 2013, served his ban and now is skiing better than ever. This is about where one expects both of them to be, consistently. If Loginov can fix a couple things and gain some more confidence, he'll start winning.
Point is, if Loginov is still doping, then what is Boe on? There is no way one of them isn't doping when the other one is.
ps, I get your sacrasm
Russia's Shipulin quits biathlon amid doping probe
Russian biathlon star Anton Shipulin on Tuesday announced he had lost "motivation" and would retire from the sport, weeks after Austrian prosecutors announced a doping probe into his team.
Shipulin has always rejected claims against him but he and other top sports stars were barred from the Winter Olympics this year as part of a ban on Russia for state-sponsored doping.
"This race will be the last of my career," the 31-year-old said of a competition in Germany's Gelsenkirchen on December 29, according to Russian news agencies.
"There's no sense in carrying on torturing myself, my fans and my loved ones. I can't find in myself the motivation that I need," he told a press conference in Moscow.
"On top of that there's the situation with my health, which is unrelenting. Three times in the last month I've suffered from viral infections."
"I am not trying to run from problems. I have always said I was clean," he said, but added that he was no longer finding pleasure in the sport.
Austrian officials announced on December 13 they were investigating members of Russia's biathlon team over alleged doping offences at the 2017 World Championships in the Austrian town of Hochfilzen.
December 24. /TASS/. Officers of the Russian Anti-Doping Agency (RUSADA) collected a total of 217 doping samples of national biathletes between January 1 and December 15, 2018, according to the agency’s December report.
Thirty three doping tests were collected from Russian biathletes within the previous two months and the list of tested athletes increased by 12 against the number reported in mid-October. Valentina Nazarova (Teletsyna) was subjected to most doping tests (nine in total) compared to the rest of the tested biathletes.
In 2017 Russian biathletes were subjected to 311 doping tests on behalf of the RUSADA. Nikita Ovchinnikov passed 12 tests for performance enhancing drugs.
The significant number of doping tests in the previous year owed to the requirements of the International Olympic Committee (IOC), which allowed participating in the 2018 Olympics athletes, who turned in a certain number of doping samples.
Russian Olympic Biathlon Champions Evgeny Ustyugov and Svetlana Sleptsova turned to the Russian Investigative Committee asking to allow their representatives to participate jointly with experts from the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) in the review of the electronic archives’ data of the Moscow Anti-Doping Laboratory (LIMS). This was stated in a letter of Ustyugov and Sleptsova to the Russian Investigative Committee and a copy of the letter was obtained by TASS.
Of course I do agree that performance can indicate PED use particularly in events where the conditions are similar and there are many attempts in the event quite regularly (100m/800m running, field athletics etc). As you mentioned, the more there is noise in the data, the more difficult it is to draw conclusions from the data.python said:aragon, performance alone has never been nor is likely to lead to an official doping offense. that much is clear. yet people are free to speculate using the various more or less objective/subjective observations.
Aragon said:Whereas blood doping researchers such as Tapio Videman that Jim Stray-Gundersen have been very cynical about the state of sports, both have maintained that half of the 2001 XC FIS championships medallists weren't blood because their blood showed no significant abnormalities.
Libertine Seguros said:If one is clean, then it is easy to see why somebody would lose motivation when all of their achievements will be discredited and devalued by association because of where one is from, and with several illnesses to boot, any performance drop-off will be likely attributed to doping even where it is not present.
If one is not clean, then it is easy to see why somebody would lose motivation when they're likely about to get caught or at least have to tone it down, and any performance drop-off will likely be attributed to doping whether or not it's present.
A few of the premature retirements we've seen in recent years have been partly due to not wanting to play the game anymore - Ustyugov could easily have kept going for a good few years, Vilukhina likewise - plus the endless cycle of selection race + World Cup trimester + selection race + World Cup trimester means athletes get overworked even if doping isn't a factor - Olga Podchufarova effectively retired at 25 because of burnout, and she wasn't named at all in McLaren. At 31, Shipulin would likely be headed to the tail end of his peak years regardless and with so much of the team's expectations having been on his shoulders for the last Olympic cycle, perhaps Loginov's showings this season has meant he'll be allowed to let go. There is something of a pattern of established athletes retiring quietly a little into a season when they realise the spark is gone - Michael Greis, Vincent Jay and Olga Zaitseva all in recent memory.
Not wrong at least according to Stray-Gundersen and Videman, because here is how they described their own study:John de Savage said:Wrong.
We do know, because the material was published in 2003. 12 out of 25 had normal hematological profile and 1 out of 25 had abnormal profile, so that makes it roughly half. Here is a link to the PDF-file:John de Savage said:Fifty percent of medal winners had "highly abnormal hematologic profiles". What percentage were "normal"? We' don't know.
frenchfry said:Natalia Nepryaeva wins the Toblach 10km at the Tour de Ski.
Along with Bolshunov, Chervotkin, and Spitsov she is coached by Yuri Borodavko, once suspended for doping offenses.
Spitsov hadn't even competed in a World Cup race until December 2017 (Davos) but a few months later won two Olympic silver medals and a bronze.
I would love to believe that the new generation of Russians are clean, but…
Aragon said:Not wrong at least according to Stray-Gundersen and Videman, because here is how they described their own study:John de Savage said:Wrong.
Jim Stray-Gundersen (2006): ”Half the people who won medals were clean”.
Tapio Videman (2011) answering the question "Are there clean athletes at the top": "Of course. For example, Half of the medals of the 2001 ended up to clean athletes.
We do know, because the material was published in 2003. 12 out of 25 had normal hematological profile and 1 out of 25 had abnormal profile, so that makes it roughly half. Here is a link to the PDF-file:John de Savage said:Fifty percent of medal winners had "highly abnormal hematologic profiles". What percentage were "normal"? We' don't know.
http://www.svtstatic.se/image-cms/svtse/1518015484/svts/article16931346.svt/BINARY/Abnormal_Hematologic_Profiles_in_Elite.2.pdf
It is totally true that there have been allegations about something fishy going on with the few missing samples. As one interesting anecdote, both Stray-Gundersen and Videman became somewhat cynical about the anti-doping work later because no action was taken against the known dopers of 2001 and Videman has maintained that the entire anti-doping testing system should be abolished altogether.
We don't know whether that is their only evidence of cleanliness of the twelve or so athletes, only that two of the more cynical scientists of the 2003 paper draw that conclusion from the available evidence (I would take the public opinion of Lereim with a pinch of salt).John de Savage said:Thanks for the clarification, but having a Hb below 16.4 and retics below 2.9 is not very strong evidence of cleanliness, even before the ABP. Look at Rasmussen and Landis.