Doping inspector backs Armstrong

Page 22 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.

Sprocket01

BANNED
Oct 5, 2009
525
0
0
Dr. Maserati said:
...Because they know he doped.
Previous Director Leblanc admitted, we have been "fooled".

I doubt anyone would stop him from taking part in the tour if it came down to it.
 

Dr. Maserati

BANNED
Jun 19, 2009
13,250
1
0
Sprocket01 said:
I doubt anyone would stop him from taking part in the tour if it came down to it.

I actually agree with you on this - given Armstrongs reputation for litigation and intimidation.
 

Sprocket01

BANNED
Oct 5, 2009
525
0
0
Dr. Maserati said:
So - you agree he doped in 1999 -

The truth is we don't know, but I've always said someone would have to make the case why he would not have doped in 99 rather than he did dope, since he'd be an idiot not to do what everyone else was doing and not be competitive.

and had a small Blood Transfusion this year.

No as I said I think that unlikely. But the point is, even if he did, it wasn't EPO.
 
Jul 19, 2009
949
0
0
Sprocket01 said:
EPO was standard protocal for GC back in the 1990s - there was no test. It by no way means he used EPO all the way through when their was regular testing for these substances. In his later tour wins he did less attacks and became more strategic - I'm pretty sure he played it clean for the most part.

Since Lance had no big drop in performance and power output since he doped with EPO along the 1999 TDF, we can only conclude that he doped on other TDF.

His last TDF was done with less help because of blood controls that limits the amount of transfusion.
I predict that Lance will stop to publish his test results to have more free-room with the variation of his blood values.
 
Jul 19, 2009
949
0
0
Sprocket01 said:
Even if you think he used EPO he would unlikely have done so for all of his tour podium wins - the allegation in the last one, for instance, was a small blood tranfusion. It doesn't explain his legendary abilities.
His only legendary ability is to lie with a such facility even on a podium when people where just waiting smart words as does a tennis player receiving a trophy.
 

Dr. Maserati

BANNED
Jun 19, 2009
13,250
1
0
Sprocket01 said:
I don't know, but his main problem is he just couldn't match LA on power to weight ratio. Interesting article on how they managed LA's weight through the season...

http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/8514206/page/2/

Are you trying the ruin the guy?

Dont go showing Lances secrets on a public forum - all the other Pro's might realise that you have to keep your weight down to do well in the mountains.
Imagine what fattys like Schelk and Contador could do with that info?
 

Sprocket01

BANNED
Oct 5, 2009
525
0
0
poupou said:
Since Lance had no big drop in performance and power output since he doped with EPO along the 1999 TDF, we can only conclude that he doped on other TDF.

His last TDF was done with less help because of blood controls that limits the amount of transfusion.
I predict that Lance will stop to publish his test results to have more free-room with the variation of his blood values.

Well I don't trust these power comparions that people throw around. They are very unreliable. But I'm sure he improved the effectiveness of his training.
 
Jul 3, 2009
18,948
5
22,485
Sprocket01 said:
Well I don't trust these power comparions that people throw around. They are very unreliable. But I'm sure he improved the effectiveness of his training.

I think he was still recovering from cancer in 1999, as evidenced by his TUE.
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,854
2
0
And it happens again...... The troll pops up and posts every *** thing he can think of in order to get others to pay attention to him
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,854
2
0
CentralCaliBike said:
I guess that I ride with a majority of a minority then. I know some think he has and continues to use EPO - I know a lot more that either do not care enough to have seriously considered the matter OR actually believe it is entirely possible that he road clean, at least since 2000 (note: I am not riding with uneducated morons either since I suspect you will probably think that).

You and your friends are not the average cycling fan.

Europe is the home of the sport and that is where vast majority of the fans of the sport are. Viewer ship and race attendance in the US is a small fraction of what it is in Europe.

Bob Roll said that average Belgium 8 year old knows more about cycling then any American fan. Something this forum proves daily.
 
Jul 23, 2009
1,120
2
0
RTMcFadden said:
The vast majority of cycling fans can't tell the difference between thinking and knowing.

A thousand years ago everyone knew the world was flat - a statement with a few errors I admit. To make it much more accurate I think you would have to say, a thousand years ago a majority of people thought the world was flat.

At least this is my impression of the difference between thinking and knowing.
 
Jul 23, 2009
1,120
2
0
Race Radio said:
You and your friends are not the average cycling fan.

Europe is the home of the sport and that is where vast majority of the fans of the sport are. Viewer ship and race attendance in the US is a small fraction of what it is in Europe.

Bob Roll said that average Belgium 8 year old knows more about cycling then any American fan. Something this forum proves daily.

I really like Bob Roll but I am sure that you do not believe everything he says - Bob usually is on the LA band wagon.

Quoting Bob Roll to as evidence that eight years olds in Europe know more than any American fan weakens your argument that people in Europe are more aware of doping practices than in the United States.
 
Aug 13, 2009
12,854
2
0
CentralCaliBike said:
I really like Bob Roll but I am sure that you do not believe everything he says - Bob usually is on the LA band wagon.

Quoting Bob Roll to as evidence that eight years olds in Europe know more than any American fan weakens your argument that people in Europe are more aware of doping practices than in the United States.

Thanks for proving my point.
 

Dr. Maserati

BANNED
Jun 19, 2009
13,250
1
0
scribe said:
All cycling pros have a curve. Since we are talking about indurain, have a looksee at his early career results.....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miguel_Indurain
What Wiki doesnt report is his win in the Tour de l'Avenir in 1986.
Tour de l'Avenir - translates to the "the Tour of the future"- that win put him on the list of future champions.

Mig was riding both the Vuelta - which was in April - and Tours in his early years at the service of his team leader, Pedro Delgado.
In the late 80s he was made captain for the Vueltas - so the DNFs in the Vuelta were more alarming than his low placing in the Tours.

He appeared to be suffering from the pressures that the Spanish press had placed on him from his earlier performances.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Sprocket01 said:
I'm not convinced at all Armstrong doped this year - in fact I find it unlikely - but the allegation is that it was a relatively small blood tranfusion. His crit hardly changed so he certainly wasn't jacked out of his mind. We should be honest about this.

I think we can all agree that cheating is cheating, and that Armstrong doesn't deserve any of his podium spots from any of his tours. Surely you have to agree with that.
 
May 10, 2009
4,640
10
15,495
Sprocket01 said:
I don't know, but his main problem is he just couldn't match LA on power to weight ratio. Interesting article on how they managed LA's weight through the season...

http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/8514206/page/2/

Someone, maybe the same people who framed Lance, put his blood in a doping clinic in 2006.
Although Ullrich did say that whoever can't put two and two together as regards what happens in professional cycling is beyond my help. Wonder what he was on about...strange...