Here's a nice one:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/nov/21/wa-police-chief-defends-swearing-officer?CMP=twt_fd
In Perth, Western Australia, a cyclist was apprehended and apparently given an on-the-spot fine for an infringement we as yet do not know the nature of.
The cyclist in question also didn't know, and asked the Poilice officers in question. They were non-responsive and as they were retreating to their vehicle, the cyclist admonishes them with, "Go catch some f***ing criminals."
To see what happens next, please watch the video (if it's geo-blocked in your part of the world, let me know and I'll give you a rundown.)
Now, I don't condone speaking to anyone with that kind of language, nor do I know the nature of, or even if the cyclist has committed some kind of traffic infringement. I have no idea if the cyclist was cycling in a way that endangered either his well-being or that of anyone else. That kind of information has been unfortunately deemed irrelevant.
What is clear enough is whatever the cyclist has been accused of is of a far less serious nature than the police officer who not only warned the cyclist to stop swearing with a few blue words of his own, but also threatened his bodily integrity with what was likely to happen to him if he was to spend a night in the lock up.
Yet the police commissioner of WA, Karl O'Callaghan, defended his officer to the utmost with these words,
"He was under pressure from someone who is extremely cocky, had a very bad attitude ... the policeman was trying to do his job and he gets this tirade back. He lost his cool," the commissioner told Fairfax radio.
"This guy has accepted no blame for the escalation of the situation whatsoever. His total view of the world is it is somebody else's problem, they did the wrong thing and I was OK.
"The public have had enough of this general lack of respect for people in authority, and not just police."
How about a 'general lack of respect' for the rights of citizens that the Police force is supposed to uphold? Is asking for what one is being charged with an 'escalation of the situation'? If the Officer was frustrated with the cyclists attitude, isn't it understandable the cyclist was also frustrated with the attitude of the police officer's?
I hear this thing a lot, that cyclists are so cocky and arrogant for being educated enough to know what is lawful on the roads, for taking up a measly part of tarmac, for knowing how public roads are funded and their right to use them.
Yet being arrogant and ignorant enough to claim another human being is fair game on the road because the only motor their vehicle uses is heart, lungs, muscle, not to mention an awful lot of brains, is justified.
There's a neat little quote that sums up the arrogance of disciplinary power:
'The general judicial form that guaranteed a system of rights that were egalitarian in principle was supported by these tiny, everyday, physical mechanisms, by all those systems of micropower that are essentially non-egalitarian and asymmetrical that we call the disciplines.'
Foucault, M, 'Discipline and Punish,' 1977, p.222.
Are you angry yet? More to come on this score.
EDIT: apparently the police officer's action have received an outpouring of support. That's very troubling news if you're a cyclist. If the media can make you out to be less than human because of the form of transport or leisure you choose in a free democracy, then pretty bad things can happen. When Govt bodies start getting moral, our democracy is in very bad shape.