As Swordsman claims, there are only four labs in the world with the improved testing methods. None of these is in Mexico, I guess.BotanyBay said:How often are they (and who are) tested? And are they tested for Clenbuterol?
As Swordsman claims, there are only four labs in the world with the improved testing methods. None of these is in Mexico, I guess.BotanyBay said:How often are they (and who are) tested? And are they tested for Clenbuterol?
ilillillli said:Something tells me Spanish farmers are going to start treating all their cows with EPO, CERA, HGH, and Alberto Contador's blood. Just to keep this "I ate a weird steak" excuse on the "mesa".
ilillillli said:Something tells me Spanish farmers are going to start treating all their cows with EPO, CERA, HGH, and Alberto Contador's blood. Just to keep this "I ate a weird steak" excuse on the "mesa".
El Pistolero said:A lot of people testing positive for Clen.
It's funny how people say here that Contador's defence is a joke with the argument that more people should get busted for clen if it was true. But everytime someone gets busted for clen they think he's guilty right away
Quite funny. And I'm aware Contador has doped in his career. But I can believe the Clen was an accident.
sublimit said:The use of Contador blood for enhancing cow racing is the next big thing, particularly for Qatar,Dubai.
American bullriders might also be interested.
You have a difficult choice : to punish sometimes an innocent guy to protect a lot of guys,theswordsman said:She says "suspect", but in WADA terms, any trace is guilt, period. The guy who proved Mexican meat before still lost a year of his career. They would rather punish innocent people than let a cheater get away, even though guys get away with using things a lot more beneficial to their performance. Contador's level was forty times less than labs are required to detect. This one was even less. I don't know mountain biking - was this training at a time when a guy would be desperate enough to lose weight that he would use drugs?
flicker said:I am going down to Baja for XMAS and I have always noticed how lean the beef is there. I think I will buy my meat from COSTCO in CABO(imported beef) or eat fish.
No way I want to eat clen.
El Pistolero said:It's funny how people say here that Contador's defence is a joke with the argument that more people should get busted for clen if it was true. But everytime someone gets busted for clen they think he's guilty right away
Blakeslee said:This could also be looked at the opposite way. All of the recent Clenbuterol positives point to the possibility the drug is commonly used by professional riders as a performance enhancer. I believe Contador and others are using the beef defense because there is already some precedent for overturned or reduced suspensions based on this defense.
krebs303 said:I had a Mexican Rib Eye steak last night. delicious.
Wave as ya go past on your way to Cabo
Feliz Navidad
flicker said:I do not mean to slam Mexican beef. I see the darn cattle out there in Baja with chollo cactus stuck to their faces and rumps. I don't see the Mexican natives even having feedlots. Everything I see is free range, the cattle live off brush weeds and cactus. We used to buy pork from the guys who worked out at the dumps, the pigs lived off the slop, nothing wrong with that,just doing things natural.
Clen in feed lots, how would that go.... lets see feed yo bull some clen and then fatten him up quick on grain at the feedlot and sell.... sounds expensive....still it seems like that would take a month for fattening, by then the clen would clear. I think when I am on vacation I will just catch my fish from the sea of Cortez, and augment my diet with some kid goat, goat meat rules!
sublimit said:The use of Contador blood for enhancing cow racing is the next big thing, particularly for Qatar,Dubai.
American bullriders might also be interested.
BroDeal said:I blame WADA for not fixing the detectable limit level. The director of the Cologne lab has said that accidental positives are possible when testing for extremely small amounts. We have reports of widespread contamination in Mexico and China. Instead of being proactive, WADA waited until it became a problem.
The result is that the credibility of anti-doping has been damaged. At the super low detection levels, there will always be athletes claiming that it was contamination. There will be lots of people who believe them. And having athletes who were victims of a screw-job because they ate food in a place like Mexico reinforces people's beliefe that the system is not fair.
Susan Westemeyer said:You will note that he only says "meat", not "beef".
Susan
theswordsman only quoted (accurately) what contador's team said.theyoungest said:As Swordsman claims,
correct. mexico does not even have a wada acc'ed lab. (there are only two wada labs in latin america - colombia and brasil)there are only four labs in the world with the improved testing methods. None of these is in Mexico, I guess.
crispy said:These guys need to start eating more beans and tofu.
Not sure about that one. Some claim WADA gathered and tested samples at the butcher's, which were negative. Contador's legal team says WADA did not do such thing. Has WADA actually said anything official about this?Dimtick said:There is also the fact that WADA traced Contadors meat to the source butcher shop and from there to the original farm. there was extensive testing done on the cattle as well as the butcher meat which all came back negative.
theswordsman said:All these positives for tiny amounts bring me back to this quote from the head of WADA's Montreal Lab.
WADA regulations set no minimum threshold for the drug. Ayotte doesn't favor setting one as she considers any trace finding to be suspect.
"We can't link content in urine to performance, because we don't know the time, the mode of administration or the dose," she said. "If this case is lost because they're concluding the amount is too small, that would be a major problem. It's not the end of the world, but if competent arbitrators decide that, my heart would break. More dopers would go through the net."
http://espn.go.com/olympics/blog/_/name/olympics/id/5685675
She says "suspect", but in WADA terms, any trace is guilt, period. The guy who proved Mexican meat before still lost a year of his career. They would rather punish innocent people than let a cheater get away, even though guys get away with using things a lot more beneficial to their performance. Contador's level was forty times less than labs are required to detect. This one was even less. I don't know mountain biking - was this training at a time when a guy would be desperate enough to lose weight that he would use drugs?
They know that Clenbuterol is allowed and used in a lot of countries, and enters the normal food supply. With the Contador case, it was said that only four labs in the world could detect that amount. Imagine if all labs get that precise, and all the non-vegetarian athletes from those countries get banned?
If the minimum threshold was set at a reasonable level based on real life, a lot of these cases would never have happened. And Contador is actually the perfect case to show that, because they had clean urine samples from two days before and two days after the two days that had trace amounts. They know that he didn't use it during the Tour for performance. They can't prove he cheated in any way. The idea that a guy could ride 120 miles, including four or five major climbs, and decide he needed to pop a pill for a one day weight loss plan is ridiculous.
And they still punish people like the guy who got the year for eating Mexican meat, and they want to appeal the Otcharov case. All because people like the professor in Montreal decided not to make a minimum threshold because they believe suspicion should cost someone their results and two years of their career.
It's like a couple of years ago in the US when they discovered melanine in products from China, and they worked their way into our food supply through chickens and pigs, etc. I doubt that any of the 300 million of us intentionally ingested melanine, but I'll bet a lot of us would have had it in our system at some point.
"It's used in sports where they need to cut weight," she said. "Just because it's small doesn't mean it's not doping. ... This is just the dopers adjusting, or misadjusting, to the testing."
WADA regulations set no minimum threshold for the drug. Ayotte doesn't favor setting one as she considers any trace finding to be suspect.
"We can't link content in urine to performance, because we don't know the time, the mode of administration or the dose," she said. "If this case is lost because they're concluding the amount is too small, that would be a major problem. It's not the end of the world, but if competent arbitrators decide that, my heart would break. More dopers would go through the net."
Dr. Maserati said:Wait a second - she was never quoted as saying "suspect".
It was ESPN that put the word in there in a paragraph between 2 of Ayottes quotes:
Also - you mention clean tests the 2 days before and a couple of days after. Again only 10 samples in total were sent to Cologne so most of ACs samples would have come back Clen free as all other samples went to Lausanne.