- Jun 16, 2009
- 647
- 0
- 0
Here in Holland we are forced to endure the self fellating and nauseating "journalism" of Mart Smeets, a self confessed Lance worshipper.
Mr Smeets proudly wears his bracelet at all times, and ont he very day that the Novitsky investigation was reported in the media, he managed to get the national broadcaster to show his "interview" with The Sociopath, in which he called Lance (to his face) a "tough guy" a "hero", and asked (almost tearfully) "why do all these people want to hurt you by making things up....after all the good you do?"
Mart looked like he was aroused through the entire charade.
I apologise if this has been reported before, but recently Fat Mart came up with the all time classic Lance fantasy explanation.
This is that he rode faster up a particular climb because his reconnaisance had taught him that this climb had vurtually all left hand bends - so he rode a bike with a shorter left crank to enable him to pedal through the corners without "scraping" - and not one of the other guys had thought of this etc etc
This is priceless - really my all time favourite fanboy foolishness. I mean:
1) Noone should possibly be riding fast enough up mountains where the inside pedal scraping the ground should be an issue
2) Having one crank shorter than the other would probably result in serious injury - on many criteriums all the corners go the same way, but I have never heard of anyone trying one crank shorter than the other
3) How exactly would this explain him finishing several minutes ahead of his rivals? I mean, for a start it isn't true, and even if it was we're talking about a theoretical fraction of a second difference on each corner. Most mountain ascents have +/- 20 bends....do the maths, Mart....
Mr Smeets proudly wears his bracelet at all times, and ont he very day that the Novitsky investigation was reported in the media, he managed to get the national broadcaster to show his "interview" with The Sociopath, in which he called Lance (to his face) a "tough guy" a "hero", and asked (almost tearfully) "why do all these people want to hurt you by making things up....after all the good you do?"
Mart looked like he was aroused through the entire charade.
I apologise if this has been reported before, but recently Fat Mart came up with the all time classic Lance fantasy explanation.
This is that he rode faster up a particular climb because his reconnaisance had taught him that this climb had vurtually all left hand bends - so he rode a bike with a shorter left crank to enable him to pedal through the corners without "scraping" - and not one of the other guys had thought of this etc etc
This is priceless - really my all time favourite fanboy foolishness. I mean:
1) Noone should possibly be riding fast enough up mountains where the inside pedal scraping the ground should be an issue
2) Having one crank shorter than the other would probably result in serious injury - on many criteriums all the corners go the same way, but I have never heard of anyone trying one crank shorter than the other
3) How exactly would this explain him finishing several minutes ahead of his rivals? I mean, for a start it isn't true, and even if it was we're talking about a theoretical fraction of a second difference on each corner. Most mountain ascents have +/- 20 bends....do the maths, Mart....