Mellow Velo said:
I'd currently come down on BV's side.
EBH was hanging on the Cauberg stage. In fact, he got dropped on a couple of the lesser climbs, only to claw his way back on.
However, as ingsve says, he has the potential to improve.
Have we not seen this with other riders, of late?
He sure has potential to improve, and indicative is his strong TT, which means he can put out a lot of power. If he focusses on climbing, loses quite some weight, and builds his whole season around these Ardennes Classics, he might possibly be in contention for a top 10-5.
But still, I fear that in the end, there are others who are more 'specialized' physiologically and hence, 'intrinsically' better climbers.
Presently, Valverde (178cm 61kg) (Ban?), Cunego (169cm 65kg) (form?), Gesink (187cm 68kg), A. Schleck (186cm 67kg), F. Schleck (186cm 67kg) are ahead of him in AGR, FW, LBL. In the future, I think, based on their past results, people like Van Garderen (186cm 72kg), Uran (173cm 65kg), Mollema (181cm 64kg), have shown to be much better climbers than BH, and could well take over the torch.
I mean, when was the last time that LBL or FW was won by someone of BH physiology (currently at 181cm 76kg)? Even Lars boom, with also an impressive ITT, is lighter, 191cm 72kg, and I would not rate him as a LBL or FW winner. Ivanov, latest AGR winner is 181cm 72kg, while Kroon, second, is 180cm 67kg.
At the moment, and based on his past results, he reminds me more of Devolder (182cm 72kg) and perhaps AGR winenr Ivanov, than of a nimble Bettini, Boogerd, Rebellin or Di Luca. If anything AGR is the race that is most within reach, but still LBL and FW?
I hope I am wrong though, because he sure is great to watch.