The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
And Bemer Cyclassics illustrates perfectly the point I was making. It's an obligatory WT race that almost always ends up in a sprint. EF have not brought anyone who can sprint because Van den Berg has different plans for this part of the season and they don't have anybody else.I have no problem with sprinters being less of a priority for the team but there are some races on the calendar that basically only a sprinter can have a good result in, so any WT team should have 2 or 3 guys who can get a decent result from a bunch sprint under right circumstances.
EF only have Van den Berg and he's not even confirmed for 2024.
And Bemer Cyclassics illustrates perfectly the point I was making. It's an obligatory WT race that almost always ends up in a sprint. EF have not brought anyone who can sprint because Van den Berg has different plans for this part of the season and they don't have anybody else.
No, I'm saying that Julius is not a sprinter.Are you saying that Julius is "Fake Van den Berg"?
Maybe Carthusian can somehow refine his prior climbing form,The team for the Vuelta per PCS
No Healey? I'm disappointed.
Healy was never going to ride 2 GTs this year after such an intense spring.The team for the Vuelta per PCS
No Healey? I'm disappointed.
Carapaz not coming back from TdF injury is a huge blow. That said, I'd also like to see Piccolo back on form, and I expect Quinn and Caicedo will be in breaks. And maybe Bissegger can do well in the ITT.The team for the Vuelta per PCS
No Healey? I'm disappointed.
This guy has never finished a WT race higher than 50th overall and only one stage inside top20.Camargo should be Carthy's lieutenant in the mountains, correct?
I'm not going to hold my breath on that....Maybe Carthusian can somehow refine his prior climbing form,
I had very high hopes for Carapaz this year; he could have made a difference in GC. Healy has been a revelation hence the jump in one day points.It was nice to see Caicedo, Camargo and Quinn providing some good support for Carthy but all in vain as Carthy was dropped pretty early. It looks like EF is going to fail at GC in all 3 GTs this year, which is not a good look for a climbing-focused team. I always enjoy watching stage races much less when EF doesn't have anyone in contention for top10 overall.
Also I found this graph from PCS live today interesting.
EF have short term up and downs, but long term they really seem to trend downwards.
You follow them more closely than I. Has it been their habit in the past to delay the announcements, like they do with start lists?Not a single transfer or contract extension confirmed by the team in August.
It depends on a year. Some years they announce plenty of transfers from early August (2018->2019 was like that, I believe), another time they tend to be pretty late compared to other teams.You follow them more closely than I. Has it been their habit in the past to delay the announcements, like they do with start lists?
I thought he had for a moment there.Well at least today they had Caicedo in the break and took a serious shot at winning the stage.
Yeah, when he attacked and the chasers hesitated.I thought he had for a moment there.