Re: Re:
I'm being overly harsh, but else I agree completely. Drawing might be good for them. The immense media hype back home might've killed them otherwise. They just need to make sue that this draw doesn't harm them.
Cannibal72 said:Brullnux said:It was a good performance, but against a very poor team, who struggled to string more than 5 possess together, maybe due to England's pressing but also to just a bad performance.Cannibal72 said:Brullnux said:Awful from England. Absolutely awful. You are winning 1-0 until the end in a game that should've been won a very long time ago, switch off completely out of arrogance, thinking that the game was over. The commentators in England thought the same. But that is stupid arrogance. You know that in a tournament every chance you create counts, and England had so many but converted one. Russia played terribly, England dominated throughout and yet it finishes 1-1. This is not a team that will win a tournament. Teams that win tournaments win these matches . They win them comfortably. Hypetrain: derailed.
I know that by the bolded you mean 'matches that you dominate', but the fact is that in these matches - that is the group stages - making every chance count really doesn't matter that much. Most good teams warm up as the tournament progresses; England are still overwhelmingly likely to make it out of the group, and (especially if they win on Thursday) those dropped two points won't matter very much. Some examples:
2014 World Cup: Germany impress against Portugal, but are limp in drawing with Ghana and struggle to close the game down against the USA. Argentina are not especially good across the group stages, requiring Messi's brilliance to break an interminable deadlock against Bosnia, dominating against Iran, wasting many, many chances until the 92nd minute, and then playing a fairly evenly matched game against Nigeria.
Euro 2012: Spain and Italy draw 1-1: Italy go on to 1-1 draw against Croatia. Spain otherwise impressive in group stages, to be fair.
2010 World Cup: Spain famously get beaten 1-0 by Switzerland in their opening match.
In summary, it's absurd to suggest that England's chances of doing well are over because Adam Lallana was terminally incapable of FINDING THE GOAL in one 90-minute game. England are unlikely to do well, but today's performance was very positive, not negative.
There is a big difference in drawing to the eventual finalists, or Croatia a very good team, or even Ghana or Switzerland to Russia, or at least that Russia. My problem is partly the lack of ability in the final moments, but also focus. They assumed the game was over, something that England when in the lead often do. They don't close it out, they lose focus. However, when losing, they fight to the last minute. They need to bring the same mentality to when they are winning. Italy of 2006 would've had a solid 1-0 or 2-0, not allowing after they scored Russia to have any shots. Germany would've won that, France of 1998 would've easily won that and Spain of 2008 would've out 3 or 4 past them. Had this been against a good side I wouldn't have been so negative. But it wasn't. If it were Italy playing I'd have had exactly the same reaction.
I don't think that England are in as much trouble as you suggest, simply because sides tend to grow in cohesion and confidence over the course of a tournament, but I'm absolutely with you that England need to bring that mentality to every game, and especially that Russia were atrocious; they were unbelievably poor.
I'm being overly harsh, but else I agree completely. Drawing might be good for them. The immense media hype back home might've killed them otherwise. They just need to make sue that this draw doesn't harm them.