I don't understand any of the WvA criticism. He was clearly the best of the chasers, the only mistake was that Laporte was too far out (either because of pacing, Laporte being very strong, a bit too much soft pedalling in the chase group at times, or a combination of all).
He counted on his sprint and this time (just like e.g. 2nd stage of TdF) he was the fastest so counting on his sprint was a good tactic (while it ofcourse isn't always the best tactic). Suggesting they should have had De Lie sprinting or have taken another sprinter is imho pretty irrelevant , because you cannot know if they would have done a better sprint, and as said, WvA's sprint was as good as it gets but Laporte had a gap that was just a bit too big to close sprinting.
He counted on his sprint and this time (just like e.g. 2nd stage of TdF) he was the fastest so counting on his sprint was a good tactic (while it ofcourse isn't always the best tactic). Suggesting they should have had De Lie sprinting or have taken another sprinter is imho pretty irrelevant , because you cannot know if they would have done a better sprint, and as said, WvA's sprint was as good as it gets but Laporte had a gap that was just a bit too big to close sprinting.
Last edited: