Fabio Aru 6.5w/kg

Page 12 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Re: Re:

carton said:
SkyTears said:
How many Astana riders are on the Kreuziger/Uran level ? 4? 5? this is ridiculous
You're talking about Landa and Cataldo emerging as guys who can work really hard at the front and the having the finishing kick to beat everyone but Contador and Porte at the end? Or having 7 guys in the top fifty after working harder than anyone the last two stages?

What's going to be the media-digestible explanation? I'm going with Astana finding the ultimate marginal gain: exposing guys to the wind on hot stages cools them off so they actually have more energy at the end.

If you want to be a skeptical crank, there may be two factors possibly at play:

One is that this is simply a byproduct of transparency. Since you have a very clear system of epo testing and bio-passport triggers, and the UCI has had to defend it trial after trial, the doctors now have pretty clear lines of up to what points they can micro-epo/micro-transfuse. They were trying to have a firmer grasp of how much they could push, and some riders were caught because of it. Collateral damage. Now they have an even better handle of the parameters at play.

The other is that none of their target audiences really give a darn if they're doping. Most serious cycling fans outside the hopeless romantics believe that they are doping. Their Italian and Kazakhstani fans are either too casual to know or too jingoistic to care. So why bother pretending otherwise?

The real hardcore cynics would argue that everyone is doing it, but that since Astana are not getting benefits from the "clean era" cycling narrative, that's the reason why they aren't going to waste any energy keeping up the charade. That is a little bit too harsh, particularly on everyone else, IMHO. But perhaps more digestible than the kopi luwak espresso being served at the moment.
Just one word explanation/factor is enough: FERRARI
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
Re: Re:

carton said:
SkyTears said:
How many Astana riders are on the Kreuziger/Uran level ? 4? 5? this is ridiculous
You're talking about Landa and Cataldo emerging as guys who can work really hard at the front and the having the finishing kick to beat everyone but Contador and Porte at the end? Or having 7 guys in the top fifty after working harder than anyone the last two stages?

What's going to be the media-digestible explanation? I'm going with Astana finding the ultimate marginal gain: exposing guys to the wind on hot stages cools them off so they actually have more energy at the end.

So why dont more teams do this> Oh yeah their riders can't because the Ferrari 'programmed' ones are too strong!

carton said:
If you want to be a skeptical crank, there may be two factors possibly at play:

One is that this is simply a byproduct of transparency. Since you have a very clear system of epo testing and bio-passport triggers,.............

There are up to 100 variations of EPO and the UCI can only test for a few, should it bother! When did UCI show us some transparency, heck they were defending Armstrong until the reasoned decision was released!

carton said:
and the UCI has had to defend it trial after trial, the doctors now have pretty clear lines of up to what points they can micro-epo/micro-transfuse. They were trying to have a firmer grasp of how much they could push, and some riders were caught because of it. Collateral damage. Now they have an even better handle of the parameters at play.

UCI are a joke, even their CIRC report criticised them heavily. UCI are about as anti doping as Oleg Tinkov!

carton said:
The other is that none of their target audiences really give a darn if they're doping. Most serious cycling fans outside the hopeless romantics believe that they are doping. Their Italian and Kazakhstani fans are either too casual to know or too jingoistic to care. So why bother pretending otherwise?

So you arguing that UCI are transparent, yet most cycling fans, the serious ones believe they are doping!!

carton said:
The real hardcore cynics would argue that everyone is doing it, but that since Astana are not getting benefits from the "clean era" cycling narrative, that's the reason why they aren't going to waste any energy keeping up the charade. That is a little bit too harsh, particularly on everyone else, IMHO. But perhaps more digestible than the kopi luwak espresso being served at the moment.

Of course everyone is doing it. It is part of the culture. Point to a team lead by someone who has steadfastly refused to play the doping game? They all dope. Until doping is no longer part of cycling culture and that will take a monumental change and effort, which we have failed to see we can safely assume that doping culture is still as pervasive as it ever was and take the talk of Vaughters and Brailsford with a tiny pinch of salt that it deserves.
 
Re:

SkyTears said:
How many Astana riders are on the Kreuziger/Uran level ? 4? 5? this is ridiculous

It's pretty simple really.

You hoover up a large number of promising amateurs, & dope them up & measure their improvements, so you can identify the responders. You then take the best 30-40 of them & spread them into semi-pro feeder teams, & maintain their individual programs to build them up the optimum 'safe' level you can get them to, to build up their 'naturally talented' Bio-Passport.

Once their baseline values are established at a suitably insane level, & they haven't triggered any positives, they can be promoted into the full Pro ranks & by virtue of the number of them, it's no big deal if one tests positive, because there's twenty more behind them, with equally good numbers !
 
Re: Re:

FoxxyBrown1111 said:
If they all dope, the better team still prevails, especially if more people get in the pool.

Change the definition of sport changing from the race on the road, to uncontrolled human experimentation in the hotel room/van.

Are you okay with the people that will die from doping gone wrong?
Can we send you the medical bills from the athletes with health consequences from doping?

Because that's what has already happened.
 
Jun 15, 2009
8,529
1
0
Re: Re:

DirtyWorks said:
FoxxyBrown1111 said:
If they all dope, the better team still prevails, especially if more people get in the pool.

Change the definition of sport changing from the race on the road, to uncontrolled human experimentation in the hotel room/van.

Are you okay with the people that will die from doping gone wrong?
Can we send you the medical bills from the athletes with health consequences from doping?

Because that's what has already happened.

I think it all got a little confused...
It was the usual xy is winning > thus doping better than the rest and/or UCI protection... well, cycling is not swimming, FIFA, MLB, NFL, NBA or T&F... It is as Järmann said: Without all the tests we would have deads. And we actually don´t (unless crazy ones really don´t care like Gianetti, Horner or LA. Then death is within reach). Cycling is doing a pretty good job compared to others. Life expectancy is as good (or better) than the average guy. Cycling implemented as firsts: 50% rule, ooc tests, health tests before GT, blood tests, passport, CIRC, etc... I am not the one jumping the bandwagon of MSM: cycling bad > so I have to think cycling bad.

After all: If doping can´t be prevented, do what´s possible (which is what cycling does). So if I see talented guys prevail, I can live with reality (them doping micro-dosing). The only thing I can´t stand are over the top psychos that go all-in, thus play russian roulette (to get caught any time), and phuck tomorrow & insult my brain (like Horner or the untested guys from SAm like Diaz).

AST has 8 guys in the line-up who would be captains in other teams. So what we see can be expected. There is nothing unusual. Except the fact that cyclists (as in all pro sports) work-place-dope or at least bent the rules to a max...
 
Re: Re:

keeponrollin said:
SkyTears said:
How many Astana riders are on the Kreuziger/Uran level ? 4? 5? this is ridiculous

It's pretty simple really.

You hoover up a large number of promising amateurs, & dope them up & measure their improvements, so you can identify the responders. You then take the best 30-40 of them & spread them into semi-pro feeder teams, & maintain their individual programs to build them up the optimum 'safe' level you can get them to, to build up their 'naturally talented' Bio-Passport.

Once their baseline values are established at a suitably insane level, & they haven't triggered any positives, they can be promoted into the full Pro ranks & by virtue of the number of them, it's no big deal if one tests positive, because there's twenty more behind them, with equally good numbers !

So how do you keep quiet the ones that don't respond, that just makes no sense.
 
Aru's secret is...you guessed it...using a higher cadence!

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/giro-ditalia-shorts-lelli-suspended-for-a-day-betancur-switches-focus-to-stage-wins

Gazzetta dello Sport has revealed that Fabio Aru has worked on his pedalling cadence during the winter to be more efficient and use less energy on the climbs of the Giro d’Italia.

“Analysing the date from mountain finishes and his training climbs from last year, we saw that Aru’s cadence was 89/90 rpm,” Aru’s coach Maurizio Mazzoleni told Gazzetta dello Sport.

“This year it is up to 90/92, while his rivals have a cadence of between 86 and 93 rpm. To improve it we’ve worked a lot on improving his pedal stroke, both in the gym and on the road during climbing efforts. A better and more agile pedal action is more efficient, allowing a bigger saving of muscle glycogen.”
 
Aug 31, 2012
7,550
3
0
Re:

LaFlorecita said:
Is the difference between 89/90 and 90/92 really that big :confused:
It seemed to help Lance a lot. Wasn't that why he won almost every time trial and MTF? Cadence?
 
Re: Re:

del1962 said:
keeponrollin said:
You hoover up a large number of promising amateurs, & dope them up & measure their improvements, so you can identify the responders.

So how do you keep quiet the ones that don't respond, that just makes no sense.

Why would they talk? Omerta is real, why would they hurt their friends? The cyclists that have spilled the beans all "had their backs against the wall" in some big way that finally made them talk:

* Floyd had basically been blacklisted from the sport and was being given a kicking in the press
* Tyler had tested positive twice and had no hope of competing again
* Manzano was fired by his team after they nearly killed him
* Rasmussen was also basically blacklisted from world tour racing and still he waited til he retired

How many nobodies have come forward of their own accord and indicted a team that did nothing worse than not promote them? In any case they'd have no dirt on the WT team or on Nibali, Aru, etc.
 
Aug 31, 2012
7,550
3
0
BroDeal's title was even better than that. Aru goes there. Cadence!

Sadly, BroDeal doesn't seem to be around the clinic much these days
 
Yeah, it's a good stage for him. So far he has been best on single mountain mtfs (or relatively easy stages). Aprica and Cervinia on the other hand will let us know how much he has improved from last year.
 
Re:

SeriousSam said:
BroDeal's title was even better than that. Aru goes there. Cadence!

Sadly, BroDeal doesn't seem to be around the clinic much these days

Wait, you were around when Bro Deal was posting?

Anyway Bro in the end I think lost the plot a little, with his new found defense of Armstrong and every year predicting the forum was about to die. He loved conflict, that was for sure.

Kid did have a talent for some discussions though, no doubt about that. Especially for getting dirty with the trolls, there was no one better.
 
Aug 31, 2012
7,550
3
0
yes, lurked a bit before signing up
Fabio Aru’s agent and lawyer have confirmed that they will begin legal action, along with the Astana team, against Greg Henderson for the accusations he made against the Astana team leader on Twitter.
Alex Carera – Aru’s agent, and Giuseppe Napoleone – a lawyer often hired by Italian cyclists, revealed that the legal action has been taken ‘to protect the good name and honour of Fabio Aru and the team (Astana) he rides for.”
The good name of Astana eh? :p :p