- Apr 28, 2009
- 493
- 0
- 0
Pro2010 said:What would prompt that comment? We are all human, and in that we are not perfect at all. We can all lead by our present examples, not our pasts. We all can be role models. I know you have all done wrong either deliberately or by accident. No one is above that. Even the members on this board. Most of whom have never raced a bike professionally but instead prefer to lurk on boards like this, passing judgement on everyone else like it's some kind of shootout. You all are so high and mighty- Until you've been there and done it, it's pretty hard to know what you'd do. Armchair sportsmen, gotta love em. (sarcasm).
this_is_edie said:sigh, I guess you need to practice your google skills and and not everything on wikipedia is correct.
From http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/oneill-set-to-return-with-bahati-foundation-team
"While the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority (ASADA) found that O'Neill was at "no significant fault" for the doping positive and attempted to levy a 15-month reduced ban, which would have allowed him to race the 2009 season, an appeal by ASADA, the UCI and the World Anti-Doping Agency resulted in a full two-year ban with an effective end-date of June 13, 2010."
so who's whiner now?
edit to add: more info on this one: http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/oneill-out-until-2010
Big GMaC said:But now:
While the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority (ASADA) found that O'Neill was at "no significant fault" for the doping positive and attempted to levy a 15-month reduced ban, which would have allowed him to race the 2009 season, an appeal by ASADA, the UCI and the World Anti-Doping Agency resulted in a full two-year ban with an effective end-date of June 13, 2010.
But O'Neill revealed that this decision had been overturned this summer, putting the end of his suspension at an amorphous date sometime two years after a point between the date of his positive test and the date he was notified.
"The anti-doping authority recognized that the June 13 date was wrong and rectified the situation, but they didn't actually give me a firm date the suspension would end - but the latest date, that of my notification on September 23, means I am actually eligible to race now."
Despite being cleared to race, O'Neill said he would not race the Australian National Championships in Ballarat this January.
from: http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/oneill-set-to-return-with-bahati-foundation-team
Hugh Januss said:Well, that's crystal clear then.![]()
this_is_edie said:thanks GMac.
now back to Flandis. Is it a good move for the Bahati to hire him? I assume they think that he can win races again even though he had no results last year.
Will his presence detract from the team's mission? Is any publicity good publicity?
knewcleardaze said:Anyone care to venture to guess what a team like Bahati Foundation can afford to pay someone like Landis? My guess would be maybe $40,000 a year?
What do others think?
Pro2010 said:What would prompt that comment? We are all human, and in that we are not perfect at all. We can all lead by our present examples, not our pasts. We all can be role models. I know you have all done wrong either deliberately or by accident. No one is above that. Even the members on this board. Most of whom have never raced a bike professionally but instead prefer to lurk on boards like this, passing judgement on everyone else like it's some kind of shootout. You all are so high and mighty- Until you've been there and done it, it's pretty hard to know what you'd do. Armchair sportsmen, gotta love em. (sarcasm).
Colm.Murphy said:a puck back at me. someone must keep you on your toes. irritating innit?
for what its worth, the point is you've exposed the nature of your intentions, be it baiting with your quick-flip calling of the hypocrite. is that all you can add?
hate the dopers?
do you enjoy being entertained by cycle racing?
do you enjoy music? what are your fave bands? illuminate us.
I see someone else picked up how Velonews interprets the Landis affair. I guess doping suspensions are now based on "reports", no need for messy arbitration hearings and appeals to instances in far away lands.pedaling squares said:Welcome back.
WTF?
I don't know how much inner city youth are going to relate to small town Mennonite boy who rode hard, won big, and got nabbed for cheating. Seems like a weird way to inspire them.
I like the way velonews wrote about Landis being caught.
Floyd Landis won the 2006 Tour de France, but was later disqualified after a French anti-doping lab reported that he tested positive for synthetic testosterone during the race.
Sounds like those nasty Frenchmen are making up rumours about our good hometown boy. Why not just say that his pee contained synthetic testosterone?
frenchfry said:I see someone else picked up how Velonews interprets the Landis affair. I guess doping suspensions are now based on "reports", no need for messy arbitration hearings and appeals to instances in far away lands.
does Bahati have a UCI licence? If not, they cant ride ToC.BroDeal said:The comments on the Velonews article are classic. The Velonews readers must be smokin' the good stuff.
The CN article can be read to imply that the ToC will be important for Bahati and FLandis will target it. I would love to see FLandis beat Bottle.
blackcat said:does Bahati have a UCI licence? If not, they cant ride ToC.
I bet they dont. Aren't they a parking lot crits team?
blackcat said:does Bahati have a UCI licence? If not, they cant ride ToC.
I bet they dont. Aren't they a parking lot crits team?
blackcat said:does Bahati have a UCI licence? If not, they cant ride ToC.
I bet they dont. Aren't they a parking lot crits team?
Boeing said:parking lot crit team? bwaahahahahahah dude that is great. and floyd still sports the 70's porn stash
