Maxiton said:
To prosecute a case against Floyd Landis will have a huge chilling effect on those within sport who want to come clean about sport. It will chill, as well, all those who think about taking on powerful people in general, and Lance Armstrong in particular. A prosecution of Landis would take place within the shadow of the immense fraud said to have been perpetrated by Team USPS, its owners, its star rider, but not prosecuted: it will take place within the shadow of a federal investigation of Armstrong, et al., that was suddenly, arbitrarily shut down with no accounting, leaving the appearance at least of endemic corruption inside our own Justice Department.
I don't think they have a strong case against Landis, or a strong reason for pursuing one.
FL provided info about doping within USPS from 2000-04. Why he should get a get-out-of-jail free card about what he did in 2006/07, soliciting funds for defense of an AAF on Phonak, is beyond me in a theoretical sense. IF he didn't get protection in exchange for his confessions, then it sux for him. IF he felt compelled to spill the beans on things after 2004 with no protection, then that also sux for him.
He could have told all about USPS and then clammed up, but now he is either in a bind that his mealy mouth non-admission of testosterone use in that tour cannot save him from, or there were misapproprations of funds. This has nothing to do with his evidence about USPS, so why (again, in a black and white sense) should the two be linked in terms of what he is held accountable for, if he didn't take the necessary precautions to protect himself?
Is the mindset here if we help an investigation then we should not be held accountable in the future for unrelated crimes we commit? I don't agree, as I say in a black and white sense. Let me explain.
I understand your point in the bigger sense and I don't really disagree with it from a political POV in this instance, but that doesn't wipe the history. No matter if the USPS investigation took place 20 years ago or never took place, that is not an if/then trigger on whether or not FL committed unrelated fraud.
I think he should be left alone, and regardless of what I think of him in terms of what he has done I do believe he has suffered enough. I cannot imagine his life, to be honest. The govt. does look petty here, and if you read any of the political threads in here you know that the politicians in the US are not high on my respect list.
Digger - please don't extrapolate my words, as you did upthread. I said I agreed with you that in my opinion he should not be prosecuted for fraud if he used the funds for his defense. My opinion is not based upon law, and if maxitron etal are correct then our opinions are not. I made this clear to you earlier.