Re: Re:
Froomes going to establish- No Significant Fault and receives a reprimand with no period of Ineligibility...
OK thanksParker wrote
10.5.1.1 Specified Substances
Where the anti-doping rule violation involves a Specified Substance, and the Athlete or other Person can establish No Significant Fault or Negligence, then the period of Ineligibility shall be, at a minimum, a reprimand and no period of Ineligibility, and at a maximum, two years of Ineligibility, depending on the Athlete’s or other Person’s degree of Fault.
Here's an example of a reprimand: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/36404943
Froome hasn't yet been referred to a hearing so it's a bit premature to state what he is or isn't eligible for.
Froomes going to establish- No Significant Fault and receives a reprimand with no period of Ineligibility...