maxmartin said:Give Porte one more year to look like F
creepiest photo ever
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
maxmartin said:Give Porte one more year to look like F
SundayRider said:creepiest photo ever
Mr. McQ said:It simply shows determination
Something you likely never have felt
melkemugg said:Its the picture for me that illustrates the difference the best, but i can maybe draw it as a drawing for you so it does not offend you as much? Im sorry if it turned into a cheap shot but i hoped my exaggeration, to illustrate a point, was more obvious.
I dont have any clear opinion of how a ideal GT-rider should look like. But i have a clear opinion on how a healthy human being should NOT look like. And i cant imagine how that is a silly thing to discuss. There are plenty of other sports that take these issues very serious, and i cant see why cycling shouldn't do that. Its easy to compare this to the ideals in fashion. How many future cycling hopes are turning anorexic before you think it stops being silly to discuss?
This posting is absolutely disgusting.hektoren said:Even you will understand that extreme sports favor extreme qualities. In cycling power vs. weight is king. Take a look at 10 000m runners from Ethiopia or Kenya. Look healthy to you? They're a bag of bones with big lungs and heart, f'r chrissake. Take a look at world-class sprinters. Look healthy to you?
This whole debate, based on how Froome looks to people who've never been close to world-class elite athletes is just plain stupid, and you're a contributor to making us all a bit more stupid. Just stop.
Froome is primed and ready. Now let the race start. Unless he's found to be juiced on more than beetroot, he's clean. If people thinks it's possible to find dopers by looks only, there'd be no use for all million-dollar labs working for us.
hektoren said:Even you will understand that extreme sports favor extreme qualities. In cycling power vs. weight is king. Take a look at 10 000m runners from Ethiopia or Kenya. Look healthy to you? They're a bag of bones with big lungs and heart, f'r chrissake. Take a look at world-class sprinters. Look healthy to you?
This whole debate, based on how Froome looks to people who've never been close to world-class elite athletes is just plain stupid, and you're a contributor to making us all a bit more stupid. Just stop.
Froome is primed and ready. Now let the race start. Unless he's found to be juiced on more than beetroot, he's clean. If people thinks it's possible to find dopers by looks only, there'd be no use for all million-dollar labs working for us.
BroDeal said:Stop being obtuse. Contador is very thin. Froome is way way beyond that.
Mr. McQ said:It simply shows determination
Something you likely never have felt
the sceptic said:world class sprinters and Kenyan long distance runners are known to be clean obviously
Handle it with caustic and surreptitious sarcasm and you will do well my son!Ripper said:As I noted in the Sky thread, le Tour starts tomorrow. I might need to bug out of the forum for the next 3 weeks.
It's gonna get full ***. I just don't know if I can handle the idiocy.
He's definitely on what is called the edge of the razor.Benotti69 said:As long a they keep the Skyborgs water resistant they shouldn't fail like Woggins.
Ripper said:As I noted in the Sky thread, le Tour starts tomorrow. I might need to bug out of the forum for the next 3 weeks.
It's gonna get full ***. I just don't know if I can handle the idiocy.
frenchfry said:What is scary is that not only is the dawg the favorite to win the TDF, he is the overwhelming favorite.
How did cycling get itself into this situation?
As you say, it is going to be a looooong 3 weeks.
Isn't this just made up?hektoren said:Well, as soon as they find picograms of dope in Kenyan long distance runners, I'll be thoroughly shamed, won't I. Go ahead!
Sprinters is another matter entirely. But good and clean sprinters with a beneficial composition of fast-twitch fibers in their muscles tend to look like the Hulk, nevertheless.
hektoren said:My wife is 172cm, and weighed 42 kg when I met her at 21. She's been like that all through her adult life and through three pregnancies. She eats a lot of pasta, chips, drink what I would consider a tall amount of wine, all the bad stuff you ain't supposed to eat and drink. She's 51 yrs old today, still at 42 kg, beats all but the top 1% of marathon runners her age, and she's extremely healthy. I know. I'm an internist.
Now, Chris Froome is a bit like my wife, though she's got tits and hasn't got that ugly mug, but what I find extremely annoying in your reply is that you have a pre-conceived notion of how an elite athlete should look like. Froome is clearly out-of-bounds for you, but as a physician close to elite athleticism I don't bat an eye-lid.
As I've stated: He's primed. He's the one who has to carry all excess weight through hoops and mountains for the next weeks. You don't. He's prepared, he knows what it takes, he has gone through all the machinations neccessary for one ultimate goal. You haven't. Now who the f*** are you to say for sure that he isn't healthy? That his looks reveals a certified doper? You just don't know. I don't know either, but by the look of Froome i can certainly say that he means business.
Stop being obtuse. Contador is very thin. Froome is way way beyond that.
hektoren said:As I've stated: He's primed. He's the one who has to carry all excess weight through hoops and mountains for the next weeks. You don't. He's prepared, he knows what it takes, he has gone through all the machinations neccessary for one ultimate goal. You haven't. Now who the f*** are you to say for sure that he isn't healthy? That his looks reveals a certified doper? You just don't know. I don't know either, but by the look of Froome i can certainly say that he means business.
Libertine Seguros said:Imagine if, at the end of the 2011 Tour, on Cadel Evans' victory parade, somebody told you Chris Froome would be the favourite to win the 2013 Tour.
You'd have had second thoughts about the cheese and mushroom baguette you just ate.
airstream said:What about does it tell? Inability to predict the future disappoint you, the Tour favoritism is something that should be suffered out through many years and Froome doesn't match it, anything else?