@Benotti69
So no actual credible evidence then. Thought not.
The argument you present in your last paragraph is ridiculous. There are plenty of ways in which motor doping could be exposed outside of official checks...just as pharma doping has been exposed outside of doping tests. People are looking,official and otherwise. You seem to forget that people have already been caught....by UCI inspectors. The case hit the headlines, making a mockery of the sport. So much for the UCI not being interested
The fact that you (and I, as it happens) find Froome's career progression to be unbelievable does not justify whatever theories you come up with. So far we have evidence of Froome's AAF, which cannot account for much, and evidence that he rides for a team with few ethical boundaries. And that is about it.
So no actual credible evidence then. Thought not.
The argument you present in your last paragraph is ridiculous. There are plenty of ways in which motor doping could be exposed outside of official checks...just as pharma doping has been exposed outside of doping tests. People are looking,official and otherwise. You seem to forget that people have already been caught....by UCI inspectors. The case hit the headlines, making a mockery of the sport. So much for the UCI not being interested
The fact that you (and I, as it happens) find Froome's career progression to be unbelievable does not justify whatever theories you come up with. So far we have evidence of Froome's AAF, which cannot account for much, and evidence that he rides for a team with few ethical boundaries. And that is about it.