Teams & Riders Froome Talk Only

[The Hitch]

Clearly cycling began for you in the internet age, which coincidentally was the Lance era..

Just another bitter ex Lance fan?

You mean like Wiggins?

 

[Cycle Chic]

Nick Parrott ‏@NickParrottTV 5h
@chrisfroome are you training alone or with others?
Expand

of course Froome didnt reply............still missing, whereabouts unknown

 

[stutue]

You can find out exactly where he says he is here:

https://adams.wada-ama.org/adams/login.do?nopopup=true

 

[Cycle Chic]

You can find out exactly where he says he is here:

https://adams.wada-ama.org/adams/login.do?nopopup=true

just giving you a heads up stuTUE - i,m reporting you for that post.

 

[stutue]

Baffled

 

[kingjr]

*Deleted by mod*

That makes sense how exactly?

 

[stutue]

No idea. Very uncool.

For the avoidance of doubt, the subtext of my post is that Froome's whereabouts are known....by the people who need to know them.

 

[the sceptic]

No idea. Very uncool.

For the avoidance of doubt, the subtext of my post is that Froome's whereabouts are known....by the people who need to know them.

thanks for the insight.

But I dont think this will stop him from doping.

 

[ferryman]

You can find out exactly where he says he is here:

https://adams.wada-ama.org/adams/login.do?nopopup=true

The link isn't working for me at least.

 

[stutue]

Just a link to the ADAMS site.

No biggie. Just making the point that Froome will have to have register his whereabouts to the people that matter, and that isn't us via twitter.

No sure why it got Cycle Chic's goat, certainly no offence intented.

 

[Taxus4a]

You can find out exactly where he says he is here:

https://adams.wada-ama.org/adams/login.do?nopopup=true

We need a password to see the link.

Here there are people asserting things about people (the sceptic for instance). I did that and moderators told me about saying that wanst allowed.
Can someone explain me that issue?

 

[the sceptic]

We need a password to see the link.

Here there are people asserting things about people (the sceptic for instance). I did that and moderators told me about saying that wanst allowed.
Can someone explain me that issue?

I did what?

Nothing wrong with saying Froome is doping surely. Lots of evidence.

 

[stutue]

thanks for the insight.

But I dont think this will stop him from doping.

If he is doping then no, it won't stop him. But that isn't the point of the post, which is to point out that an absence of Twitter posts doesn't signify anything, despite the rather desperate attempts to try and drum up some intrigue. Much better to stick to the facts even if where doping is concerned facts are understandably hard to come by.

 

[Taxus4a]

I did what?

Nothing wrong with saying Froome is doping surely. Lots of evidence.

Any evidence.

And I think he is not doping, with IMO more evidence, but you can assert that and me no.

Is that a free forum?

 

[the sceptic]

Any evidence.

And I think he is not doping, with IMO more evidence, but you can assert that and me no.

Is that a free forum?

Everyone is free to post whatever they want as long as it is within the rules, so go ahead.

I cant think of any evidence that Froome is clean. Everything about him screams doper to me.

 

[Arrowfarm]

I cant think of any evidence that Froome is clean. Everything about him screams doper to me.

Never tested po... naaah, nevermind. I agree.

 

[Taxus4a]

Everyone is free to post whatever they want as long as it is within the rules, so go ahead.

I cant think of any evidence that Froome is clean. Everything about him screams doper to me.

It is not my problem what you can find, and I dont going to say my opinion about your thoughts. I talked to the moderators.

You can find a lot of evidence of Froome dont dope in my second signature. And if you want, we can discuss all the points, and you will see how there is any evidence. Dare about, I started, follow if you can.

 

[BYOP88]

It is not my problem what you can find, and I dont going to say my opinion about your thoughts. I talked to the moderators.

You can find a lot of evidence of Froome dont dope in my second signature. And if you want, we can discuss all the points, and you will see how there is any evidence. Dare about, I started, follow if you can.

Is it last year again?

 

[Taxus4a]

Is it last year again?

I dont going to write everything in a forum when I worte that article to answer to all those people as the sceptic.

From 2010 vuelta I have read a lot of stuopid things about cycling, about, SKY, and about Froome.

Some people said:

He was unknow, and I showed that no.
Nodody talked about him as a possible star, and I showed how that was false.
The treatment of Bilharzia help with performance or with the biopassport: false.
He is a one day rider as Jaskula..., and we said, no, he is a good rider, he has come to stay...
He is geting similar performance that in the dark era. If you go a good analysis, that is totally false.
The similar people that assert that with Cookson Sky will fly..,
But thay got always an explanation for everything.. Of course is possible to find it, but that is not to have the truth.
if you think that today nothing changed and doping is importart, of course Froome must be on the same way, but if you think that today doping is already a small part of cycling, you can see how ererything with Froome makes sense.

 

[deeno1975]

If you think that today nothing changed and doping is importart, of course Froome must be on the same way, but if you think that today doping is already a small part of cycling, you can see how ererything with Froome makes sense.

Just finished reading Juliet Macur's Cycle of Lies: The Fall of Lance Armstrong

In it she details Armstrong's doping, he and his team were on a lot more drugs than I thought he was on. It was a pharmaceutical cocktail designed to make him go faster, it was no holds barred. Suffice to say anyone who comes near his times (and the times of most of that era) is under a cloud of suspicion for me. Maybe someone who was a super talent from early age might come close and not someone who transformed overnight.

We might not see the fire, but there is a lot of smoke coming from Froome (and his team). Unproven yes but unquestionable, not at all.

 

[Futuroscope]

Just finished reading Juliet Macur's Cycle of Lies: The Fall of Lance Armstrong

In it she details Armstrong's doping, he and his team were on a lot more drugs than I thought he was on. It was a pharmaceutical cocktail designed to make him go faster, it was no holds barred. Suffice to say anyone who comes near his times (and the times of most of that era) is under a cloud of suspicion for me. Maybe someone who was a super talent from early age might come close and not someone who transformed overnight.

We might not see the fire, but there is a lot of smoke coming from Froome (and his team). Unproven yes but unquestionable, not at all.

Lance was never really a talented stage racer. I consider all of his victories to be a complete joke. So I can see more talented riders matching him with less doping.

 

[the sceptic]

Lance was never really a talented stage racer. I consider all of his victories to be a complete joke. So I can see more talented riders matching him with less doping.

why are his pre EPO results a joke? Certainly much better than anything Dawg did pre sky.

So for Dawg to still climb as fast as Lance in this day and age.. I would love to know how he is doing it.

 

[deeno1975]

Lance was never really a talented stage racer. I consider all of his victories to be a complete joke. So I can see more talented riders matching him with less doping.

Like Froome or Wiggins were always talented stage racers. Yeah, you said it "complete joke".

 

[Futuroscope]

why are his pre EPO results a joke? Certainly much better than anything Dawg did pre sky.

So for Dawg to still climb as fast as Lance in this day and age.. I would love to know how he is doing it.

I should have been more clear. I never meant his pre EPO results are a joke (whenever he actually started using EPO, he says 94-95. His word is worth crap though). I'm talking about his TDF victories. Neither do I think Froome is clean.

 

[red_flanders]

Lance was never really a talented stage racer. I consider all of his victories to be a complete joke. So I can see more talented riders matching him with less doping.

What talented rider who is clean has even approached his times? I can't think of any.