Logic Al said:
The rest of Sky aren't looking particularly special, just Froome
So what are they doing that's so obvious and arrogant? is it a new drug?
and if so, why isn't everyone else doing it?
1. Come on, you watched stage 8 didn't you? I mean sky even did a 1-2 last year already. won pretty much every race they took part in etc, got a dom to come 2nd in the giro , etc.
2. There are many theories right around the forum, I'm probably not the person to explain them, nor do I need to , this isn't about the exact how, this is about how clear it is that something is going on in front of our blind eyes.
3. Pretty sure that fairly explains itself, USPS didn't have a special drug, other people did do it, but they were protected. It could very well be that sky is doign something different other people don't have too, who knows.
The question is, what can you believe? I did not come to this forum convinced that sky were doping, I found what I saw on la planche des belles filles added to sky's 2012 season, to be too much to simply ignore it, it looked too much like USPS.
I came on here to read what much better informed people than me were saying and made up my mind based on that.
I personally don't think you need to know much more than this:
Froome was a noname cyclist, mediocre both at time trialling and climbing before the vuelta 2011.
Now he's the best climber by miles, climbing similar times to the EPO era. He's TTing better than anyone but 100%TT specialist Tony Martin, ( in what looked like worse wind conditions ).
He's leading anyone else by more than 3 minutes after 1 mountain stage and one short TT.
Add to this the Massive amount of information you can find in this forum, like about Leinders etc. and tell me if you can believe