Re: Re:
Again, it doesn't have to be some magic drug. There are now numerous cases of biological profiles simply ignored by the UCI. The only thing the UCI needs to do is not sanction the guy. It's not like he's some special case either.
The CIRC report clearly states the federation chose a rider/team to favor to grow the sport. It's happened again.
Maybe this time they are going the Athletics Kenya route and cycling through athletes?
What we know for sure is Froome has, once again, put in a wildly inconsistent performance somehow returning to his elite, but not grand tour, performances.
McLovin said:The link between 1-2 is that I tried to point out the potential exclusivity of that potential drug.
And for 3, I said THAT MANY THINGS ARE WEIRD, BUT.... .
And I don't see any of that evidence you claim there are out there. Where is Fromme's O'Reilly or something like that? 4 years and not a single minor leak?
Again, it doesn't have to be some magic drug. There are now numerous cases of biological profiles simply ignored by the UCI. The only thing the UCI needs to do is not sanction the guy. It's not like he's some special case either.
The CIRC report clearly states the federation chose a rider/team to favor to grow the sport. It's happened again.
Maybe this time they are going the Athletics Kenya route and cycling through athletes?
What we know for sure is Froome has, once again, put in a wildly inconsistent performance somehow returning to his elite, but not grand tour, performances.