- Sep 29, 2012
- 12,197
- 0
- 0
Dear Wiggo said:grizzlee said:Catwhoorg said:Per his twitter feed, the physiological testing is occuring today. Short video clip posted.
https://twitter.com/chrisfroome/status/633278404738031616
Im not a froome fan but this is pretty big news. Is there no one here that cares about this. People have been crying and moaning in here since the toiur that he still hadn't done it. Now its been done, SILENCE, not a **** word out of anyone!
Whatever. If I had a dollar for every time I read, "I'm not a fan of X but..." I could retire.
![]()
Handy Bendy Ghandi said:No axe to grind, but I'm interested whether this data you speak of has been publicly shown to be false...........or whether it's "known" to be false by this forum ?red_flanders said:Catwhoorg said:Per his twitter feed, the physiological testing is occuring today. Short video clip posted.
https://twitter.com/chrisfroome/status/633278404738031616
Good lord, he looks even worse on rollers than on the road, if such were possible.
Why does anyone care about this? If I understand correctly, it's Sky doing the testing on a guy we know is performing at a certain level. What on earth is this supposed to prove? They already have released data which is known to be false on its face.
More grist for the believers I imagine...
Handy Bendy Ghandi said:No axe to grind, but I'm interested whether this data you speak of has been publicly shown to be false...........or whether it's "known" to be false by this forum ?red_flanders said:Catwhoorg said:Per his twitter feed, the physiological testing is occuring today. Short video clip posted.
https://twitter.com/chrisfroome/status/633278404738031616
Good lord, he looks even worse on rollers than on the road, if such were possible.
Why does anyone care about this? If I understand correctly, it's Sky doing the testing on a guy we know is performing at a certain level. What on earth is this supposed to prove? They already have released data which is known to be false on its face.
More grist for the believers I imagine...
The Hitch said:Dear Wiggo said:grizzlee said:Catwhoorg said:Per his twitter feed, the physiological testing is occuring today. Short video clip posted.
https://twitter.com/chrisfroome/status/633278404738031616
Im not a froome fan but this is pretty big news. Is there no one here that cares about this. People have been crying and moaning in here since the toiur that he still hadn't done it. Now its been done, SILENCE, not a **** word out of anyone!
Whatever. If I had a dollar for every time I read, "I'm not a fan of X but..." I could retire.
![]()
Later on in the year. Guess that's how long doctoring the results to appear somewhat convincing will take.
Dear Wiggo said:Going to be some time before we see results. For some inexplicable reason.
Walkman said:The Hitch said:Dear Wiggo said:grizzlee said:Catwhoorg said:Per his twitter feed, the physiological testing is occuring today. Short video clip posted.
https://twitter.com/chrisfroome/status/633278404738031616
Im not a froome fan but this is pretty big news. Is there no one here that cares about this. People have been crying and moaning in here since the toiur that he still hadn't done it. Now its been done, SILENCE, not a **** word out of anyone!
Whatever. If I had a dollar for every time I read, "I'm not a fan of X but..." I could retire.
![]()
Later on in the year. Guess that's how long doctoring the results to appear somewhat convincing will take.
Dear Wiggo said:Going to be some time before we see results. For some inexplicable reason.
You expect him to do tests during the Vuelta and reveal them on a day by day basis?
I know you have it in for the guy (and maybe deservingly) but how would it not take some time? He started today and did one test, presumably more will do more test after the Vuelta hence the results will come out in due time.
But hey, maybe I am messing up the conspiracy theory now?
Catwhoorg said:Per his twitter feed, the physiological testing is occuring today. Short video clip posted.
https://twitter.com/chrisfroome/status/633278404738031616
I would think anyone that has to train as hard as these guys do (regardless of whether they are Sky or not/doping or not) is going to do their best to win. Throwing a race after all that work doesn't make any sense to me.The Hitch said:Exactly how I see it. They and their psycho fans are so desperate to push the - oh look, he didn't win every stage of the race, he actually only finished top 5 on some of them - we never saw that in the doped era.58teeth said:So, now that Froome is confirmed for the Vuelta...what does he do? Back off a little and appear more "human"?
I'm thinking that someone else other than him is going to win in an effort to say "Hey, he didn't win the Vuelta...he's only human! We're cleans...move along!"
Same here. They're not going to make the same greedy mistakes Armstrong et al did. It'll be a coming out party for a Sky rider. Froome will gleefully shake his head in bonerific adulation and say something like, "I'm going to have to watch out for him come July." And come July, business as usual.The Hitch said:Exactly how I see it. They and their psycho fans are so desperate to push the - oh look, he didn't win every stage of the race, he actually only finished top 5 on some of them - we never saw that in the doped era.58teeth said:So, now that Froome is confirmed for the Vuelta...what does he do? Back off a little and appear more "human"?
I'm thinking that someone else other than him is going to win in an effort to say "Hey, he didn't win the Vuelta...he's only human! We're cleans...move along!"
be careful common sense will get you thrown out of the clinicLaFlorecita said:Surely we should first wait and look at the data he releases?grizzlee said:Catwhoorg said:Per his twitter feed, the physiological testing is occuring today. Short video clip posted.
https://twitter.com/chrisfroome/status/633278404738031616
Im not a froome fan but this is pretty big news. Is there no one here that cares about this. People have been crying and moaning in here since the toiur that he still hadn't done it. Now its been done, SILENCE, not a **** word out of anyone!
1 thing I am sure about, is that it'll be a **** storm either way. If the numbers are alien, well that's dodgy, if the numbers are human, they don't match with his performances = dodgy
Cycle Chic said:Catwhoorg said:Per his twitter feed, the physiological testing is occuring today. Short video clip posted.
https://twitter.com/chrisfroome/status/633278404738031616
ERRRRR .......HOW MUCH WEIGHT HAS HE PILED ON FOR THAT ?? !!!!
- I thought it was a 'send up' !! he must have put on 5kgs - look at the size of his arms
This is the perfect time for Sky to do this, for two reasons.No_Balls said:Cycle Chic said:Catwhoorg said:Per his twitter feed, the physiological testing is occuring today. Short video clip posted.
https://twitter.com/chrisfroome/status/633278404738031616
ERRRRR .......HOW MUCH WEIGHT HAS HE PILED ON FOR THAT ?? !!!!
- I thought it was a 'send up' !! he must have put on 5kgs - look at the size of his arms
Time to kick off some clean numbers. The benefit of controlling the narrative is that you can rack out non-alien numbers in public when things doesnt matter. And come out clean mind you.
Human figures here and a low-key Vuelta could give carthe blanche for something highly extraterrestre in shall we say next July.
They want to prove that their fans will swallow what they're fed. Check the Skyborg a page back telling us how we've been put in our place - before a single shred of data is releaseddoperhopper said:Does anyone understand what the heck this VroomTest at Glaxo is supposed to "prove"? Imagine Uniballer doing the same - they would produce any number they want, no problem to go as low as needed (and if it looks incompatible with wattage from Tour estimates, then "fatigue" argument covers it all). Or do they want to prove Vroome can do even more than he already showed?
It could be a secret plan by Murdoch and Co to give the Clinic a new conspiracy to unraveldoperhopper said:Does anyone understand what the heck this VroomTest at Glaxo is supposed to "prove"? Imagine Uniballer doing the same - they would produce any number they want, no problem to go as low as needed (and if it looks incompatible with wattage from Tour estimates, then "fatigue" argument covers it all). Or do they want to prove Vroome can do even more than he already showed?
Jimsnchz said:Other than a crooked sign that reads Human Performance how do people know this is GSK? I would expect more lab stuff. Why have a water bottle? I had more stuff hooked up to me for a bike fitting.
Texeng said:It could be a secret plan by Murdoch and Co to give the Clinic a new conspiracy to unraveldoperhopper said:Does anyone understand what the heck this VroomTest at Glaxo is supposed to "prove"? Imagine Uniballer doing the same - they would produce any number they want, no problem to go as low as needed (and if it looks incompatible with wattage from Tour estimates, then "fatigue" argument covers it all). Or do they want to prove Vroome can do even more than he already showed?![]()
![]()
JackRabbitSlims said:according to forbes magazine
gsk is ranked 98 out of 100 in the worlds most reputable companies in 2015
there are some seriously dodgy outfits well ahead of them on that list
http://www.forbes.com/sites/susanadams/2015/04/21/the-worlds-most-reputable-companies-in-2015/2/