Teams & Riders Froome Talk Only

Page 1334 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Jun 10, 2010
19,897
2,256
25,680
I thought results were left vacant if someone didn't test positive at a race but was caught later? Honestly, it's hard to keep up with how these rules are implemented.
 
Jun 7, 2010
19,196
3,092
28,180
Is there even a rule? I got the impression that it's a decision of the organization of the race what to do with results?
 
Feb 20, 2012
53,939
44,325
28,180
*** loved the days when you at least had to beat your opponents on the road instead of just pulling GT wins out of your ass.
 
Jun 25, 2015
5,333
5,423
23,180
Re:

Red Rick said:
**** loved the days when you at least had to beat your opponents on the road instead of just pulling GT wins out of your ***.

Ha, yeah. But I think those days ended in 1995, correct? Was Riis the first GT winner to be stripped of title years later?

I think I might agree on declaring no winner and asterisking the "winners." Reason being that unlike a one-time event like the 100 meters, there's a whole world of calculations and team tactics that go into a race, so just saying that Froome "won" the 2011 Vuelta b/c Cobo showed passport anomalies isn't a neat and tidy solution.

But to be honest, if this cheers up Froome, I'm all for it. Poor guy, and I mean that sincerely.
 
Feb 20, 2012
53,939
44,325
28,180
Legit wonder if they had this up their sleeve all this time and are only doing it now because of the circumstances.
 
Feb 20, 2012
53,939
44,325
28,180
Re: Re:

Bolder said:
Red Rick said:
**** loved the days when you at least had to beat your opponents on the road instead of just pulling GT wins out of your ***.


But to be honest, if this cheers up Froome, I'm all for it. Poor guy, and I mean that sincerely.
Let's also give Armstrong a break then.

Dude had cancer ya know
 
Feb 1, 2011
9,403
2,275
20,680
Re: Re:

Bolder said:
But to be honest, if this cheers up Froome, I'm all for it. Poor guy, and I mean that sincerely.

Getting beaten by Cobo I think was a great thing for his career; lighting a fire in him that made him go even one step further or two.
 

rick james

BANNED
Sep 2, 2014
7,677
110
12,680
Re:

F_Cance said:
Can't be coincidence that they announce this today
giphy.gif
 

thehog

BANNED
Jul 27, 2009
31,285
2
22,485
Cobo has said he plans to appeal the decision using Froome’s Ventoux performance in 2013 as evidence he wasn’t the only one cheating :lol:
 

rick james

BANNED
Sep 2, 2014
7,677
110
12,680
thehog said:
Cobo has said he plans to appeal the decision using Froome’s Ventoux performance in 2013 as evidence he wasn’t the only one cheating :lol:
Take it to the cobo thread please
 
Dec 22, 2017
2,952
278
11,880
thehog said:
Cobo has said he plans to appeal the decision using Froome’s Ventoux performance in 2013 as evidence he wasn’t the only one cheating :lol:

Surely all Cobo has to do is use any of Froome's performances pre-2011 Vuelta to demonstrate that he wasnt the only cheat in that race :confused:
 
May 30, 2015
2,760
53
11,580
yea, guys, yesterday's indulgence attack didn't last for too long. froome is once again a villain because of cobo getiing stripped the vuelta off. )
 
Feb 20, 2012
53,939
44,325
28,180
Re:

dacooley said:
yea, guys, yesterday's indulgence attack didn't last for too long. froome is once again a villain because of cobo getiing stripped the vuelta off. )
Is that how this is supposed to work? Froome crashing yesterday does not affect him being an insult to the viewerships intelligence in the slightest.
 
Aug 11, 2010
617
142
10,180
Re: Re:

spalco said:
Bolder said:
But to be honest, if this cheers up Froome, I'm all for it. Poor guy, and I mean that sincerely.

Getting beaten by Cobo I think was a great thing for his career; lighting a fire in him that made him go even one step further or two.

That is what I was thinking. A guy who is very clearly cheating...sorry, I don't really care what happens to him. Call me evil. Call me soulless. But if you are out there making millions and lying directly to everyone, um....so what if you have some bad luck?

You didn't exactly instill a reason to care about you. My feeling is that plenty of decent people have awful things happen to them. So when something bad happens to someone choosing to do illegal things, sorry, I don't have much energy to sympathize. I didn't wish him ill. But I don't really care that he had some bad luck. He didn't really care about lying to everyone, did he?
 

rick james

BANNED
Sep 2, 2014
7,677
110
12,680
macbindle said:
thehog said:
Cobo has said he plans to appeal the decision using Froome’s Ventoux performance in 2013 as evidence he wasn’t the only one cheating :lol:

Surely all Cobo has to do is use any of Froome's performances pre-2011 Vuelta to demonstrate that he wasnt the only cheat in that race :confused:
Yip, that’s clearly how the legal system work
 
“Some bad luck”, come on, man’s career is probably over, and cheat or not (I consider him one as per my post in the Cobo thread), being indifferent or even happy (A friend of mine was gleeful to my disgust) is taking it to the limit, if not crossing it. You don’t need to weep for the cheat or weep for the cyclist, but weep for him as a fellow human being - I for one, do!
 
Aug 11, 2012
2,621
24
11,530
Re:

Red Rick said:
Legit wonder if they had this up their sleeve all this time and are only doing it now because of the circumstances.

Good point. Froome seems to have nearly the same power in this sport as Wonderboy did, which is sad.
 
Aug 11, 2012
2,621
24
11,530
Re: Re:

spalco said:
Bolder said:
But to be honest, if this cheers up Froome, I'm all for it. Poor guy, and I mean that sincerely.

Getting beaten by Cobo I think was a great thing for his career; lighting a fire in him that made him go even one step further or two.

One step further or two=doping!
 
Aug 11, 2012
2,621
24
11,530
Re: Re:

nayr497 said:
spalco said:
Bolder said:
But to be honest, if this cheers up Froome, I'm all for it. Poor guy, and I mean that sincerely.

Getting beaten by Cobo I think was a great thing for his career; lighting a fire in him that made him go even one step further or two.

That is what I was thinking. A guy who is very clearly cheating...sorry, I don't really care what happens to him. Call me evil. Call me soulless. But if you are out there making millions and lying directly to everyone, um....so what if you have some bad luck?

You didn't exactly instill a reason to care about you. My feeling is that plenty of decent people have awful things happen to them. So when something bad happens to someone choosing to do illegal things, sorry, I don't have much energy to sympathize. I didn't wish him ill. But I don't really care that he had some bad luck. He didn't really care about lying to everyone, did he?

This. Good post, I agree.
 
Aug 11, 2012
2,621
24
11,530
rick james said:
macbindle said:
thehog said:
Cobo has said he plans to appeal the decision using Froome’s Ventoux performance in 2013 as evidence he wasn’t the only one cheating :lol:

Surely all Cobo has to do is use any of Froome's performances pre-2011 Vuelta to demonstrate that he wasnt the only cheat in that race :confused:
Yip, that’s clearly how the legal system work

If your name is: Wonderboy/Froome/Astana it is.
 
Dec 27, 2012
1,446
7
4,995
86TDFWinner said:
rick james said:
macbindle said:
thehog said:
Cobo has said he plans to appeal the decision using Froome’s Ventoux performance in 2013 as evidence he wasn’t the only one cheating :lol:

Surely all Cobo has to do is use any of Froome's performances pre-2011 Vuelta to demonstrate that he wasnt the only cheat in that race :confused:
Yip, that’s clearly how the legal system work

If your name is: Wonderboy/Froome/Astana it is.

You're making progress, ateysicks ... you'll soon have them. :lol:
 
Dec 27, 2012
1,446
7
4,995
Re: Re:

Red Rick said:
dacooley said:
yea, guys, yesterday's indulgence attack didn't last for too long. froome is once again a villain because of cobo getiing stripped the vuelta off. )
Is that how this is supposed to work? Froome crashing yesterday does not affect him being an insult to the viewerships intelligence in the slightest.


No ... you're right ... no more or no less than your insensitivity being an insult to the intelligence of this thread's viewership. :geek: