- Apr 8, 2010
 
- 1,257
 
- 0
 
- 0
 
UlleGigo said:More Riis v Ullrich.
How so?
Ullrich had no chance of winning the '96 tour and Riis had no chance of winning the '97 tour.
UlleGigo said:More Riis v Ullrich.
messycolin said:To be fair to the sky set-up one can imagine that it is promised that given wiggens's age froome may be told to work this year( and next?) for the team leader. From 2014,the team rides for froome?
For those dissing the sky supporters, you have to remember that a british rider in yellow after the 1st mountain stage is beyond belief. As a young amateur rider in my past we brits always looked for robert millar, boardman etc but we always kmew that we as brits were outside the real game. You can dis sky, you can dis the supporters but screw you. Kids in the uk will be reading the press and watching tv and seeing a british guy riding with the best. On the limit, making other great riders suffer. If this isn't what cycling is about then what is?
Oldman said:The basic difference is current professionalism. Visentini had and internal cabal that actually rode against Roche who had a sudden burst of incredible...form...all year...ahem, Claudio-who was the guy we saw about the stuff?
Anyway; they will ride to place Evans and others in difficulty but may have less success in another week so it's too early to tell. It's one thing when you have 4 domestiques in a mountain stage and quite another when you have one. Cadel has made do with none before.
blutto said:....the internal cabal?...now that's funny...
Cheers
blutto
dgodave said:People arent getting the concept of an analogy.
.
messycolin said:As the person who started this...you're right. What was difficult to understand?
Interesting to watch todays stage. Froome under orders, but looking strong enough to do his own thing ie win the tour.
I am not complaining. It makes sense. Wiggins wins 2012 if things go well. Froome can go for 2013 if wiggins can't follow contador. 2014 froome is kopman.
It makes a great story. Wiggins is real british (lol. Born in belgium). Froome is pseudobritish. Not that this matters really but it does for the average public and Sky.
jilbiker said:Froome is not finished, this is the TDF NOT the Vuelta (no disrespect), I think he has seen an opportunity for the gold and he will take it. If Sky wants to chulk him out after that they can, there will be a ton of teams ready to take him and ready to buy out his Sky contract. I think he will wait for the pyrennes and fly away with his radio turned off, put the about 3 minutes between him and Wiggins.
zapata said:Would be something if brailsford finds himself with an african winner of the tour instead of the british one of the prophecy.
Apollonius said:Froome will do as he's told I suspect. He wouldn't last long without the support of his team mates, he'd be handing the GC to Nibali. The bottom line is that Wiggins doesn't seem strong enough to win it without Froome and Froom would find it impossible to rid to victory without the Sky riders putting him in the positions he needs to be in. So in the end he'll lose and so will Wiggins so ultimately what's the point in him going rogue?
His best chance is to stick with Wiggins, play his role as he has been and then hope that Wiggins has a very bad day and elevates Froome to leader by default with then full backing from the team. There's every chance that could happen too.
zapata said:Would be something if brailsford finds himself with an african winner of the tour instead of the british one of the prophecy.
jilbiker said:Froome is not finished, this is the TDF NOT the Vuelta (no disrespect), I think he has seen an opportunity for the gold and he will take it. If Sky wants to chulk him out after that they can, there will be a ton of teams ready to take him and ready to buy out his Sky contract. I think he will wait for the pyrennes and fly away with his radio turned off, put the about 3 minutes between him and Wiggins.
UpTheRoad said:If he did that and Wiggins were in 2nd place, Sky might throw him off the team like Rabo did with Rasmussen (although for different reasons).
It should be clear to everyone that Sky is riding for Wiggins and Wiggins alone. It is unfortunate for Froome as I think he can win it this year, but that is the way it seems to be.
orangerider said:Agreed. You could see Froome visibly upset when he was being given orders (probably swear words coming through the radio) to slow down after that fierce attack making Wiggins look as overrated as he is.
Interesting, considering that did not apply in the Vuelta last year. And Brailsford can't exactly argue that Froome's performance surprised him as he's been telling us how his numbers in training have always been great. Personally I think Wiggins will get preference more often than that because he has a lot more experience of working with Brailsford (2004, 2008). I feel for Froome and fear that he has probably missed the boat on his only chance to win the Tour.The team roles, he said, were clarified by the time trial, and then ended the interviews.
messycolin said:Wiggins is strong but evans may get a jump somewhere. Does froome stay with wiggins or does he follow?
Fergoose said:Interesting that in his interview with L'Equipe Froome is quoted as saying if the others make an attack and Wiggins is in trouble, he'll go after the others to secure the tour for Sky! I’m sure that will have gone down well over breakfast.
On a tangent it was funny also seeing TJVG's selective blindness and deafness at the summit today when Evans, right next to him, gets a puncture and then yells to him. As TJVG serenely descends, whistling innocently, Evans is left stranded for ages waiting for another teammate. These ambitious teammates are good for entertainment but if they were on a team I was supporting I’d want them chewed out.
The Tibetan Hat said:Froome, he's a strange one isn't he? Doesn't look like he has the media savvy to handle the situation he's gotten himself into, which is a good one, but probably not as good as he thinks.
Sure he probably is stronger than Wiggins in the mountains, but the fact of the matter is he's two minutes down and less than 20 seconds ahead of Nibbles. Tactically speaking if the team wants to maintain the jersey, is it really possible for him to make up that gap on Wiggins AND extend his lead over Nibali to something more meaningful? He's not much more than a minute up on Evans and we've seen what he can produce in week three.
While it must be a thrill to have the legs to race away for odd 20 second gaps here and there at the end of summit finishes, Froome needs to realise he's TWO MINUTES down and his team leader, a superior TT man, hasn't really faltered at all. He need to ask himself, why should Sky risk on him when they've already built such a meaningful lead over the field for their main guy?
With all this as clear as day to anyone looking at GC, the way he's practically briefing against Wiggins in the French press, possibly innocently - possibly not, has really got to make you wonder a wee bit about the guy's character.
The Tibetan Hat said:Froome, he's a strange one isn't he? Doesn't look like he has the media savvy to handle the situation he's gotten himself into, which is a good one, but probably not as good as he thinks.
Sure he probably is stronger than Wiggins in the mountains, but the fact of the matter is he's two minutes down and less than 20 seconds ahead of Nibbles. Tactically speaking if the team wants to maintain the jersey, is it really possible for him to make up that gap on Wiggins AND extend his lead over Nibali to something more meaningful? He's not much more than a minute up on Evans and we've seen what he can produce in week three.
While it must be a thrill to have the legs to race away for odd 20 second gaps here and there at the end of summit finishes, Froome needs to realise he's TWO MINUTES down and his team leader, a superior TT man, hasn't really faltered at all. He need to ask himself, why should Sky risk on him when they've already built such a meaningful lead over the field for their main guy?
With all this as clear as day to anyone looking at GC, the way he's practically briefing against Wiggins in the French press, possibly innocently - possibly not, has really got to make you wonder a wee bit about the guy's character.
