The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
staging a story of him having apparently risen from a nobody to a superstar in 2 years.
Staging? This is more or less the truth. Suddenly peaking at 33/34 is quite rare in cycling, isn't it?
Staging? This is more or less the truth. Suddenly peaking at 33/34 is quite rare in cycling, isn't it?
CADF have requested a private company, the identity of which is known to DR, to 'identify possible and known connections' between Ferrari and Fuglsang.
For sure Jakob and Alexey could be super dirty but this is super random and lacking substance so far.
Are you already sure these are unsubstantiated rumors? Seems a bit early to make that call.The thing is that in most countries, people adore their national sport stars unconditionally (okay, this is really generalising, so just knock me off if this is completely wrong), but in Denmark there always seems to be a high degree of contempt and suspicion. For example, "he always crashes anyway", "he might have won that race and such and such but in the Tour, when it matters, he is poor" and most prevalently: "(when something bad happens for a local star)" are the usual comments you see on social media all the time.
So many people are more than ready to pick up the torches when respected media come up with unsubstantiated rumours like this. Why this is the case so much in Denmark, I have no idea.
Are you already sure these are unsubstantiated rumors? Seems a bit early to make that call.
This behavior is really not uncommon and certainly not something exclusive to Danes, as you seem to be thinking. It's often simply a sarcastic way of coping with disappointment. Or being pessimistic in order to prevent disappointment (or fake not being disappointed). My local football team has left a trail of poor management for the past decade. Joking about failure and being sarcastic is sometimes the most obvious way to deal with things you are emotionally invested in. It may not have been clinic related, but i can tell you that both in Belgium (with Jurgen Van Den Broeck) and the Netherlands (with Gesink and Kelderman) there were similar feelings about them crashing out, so what did it matter anyway. It's a way to emotionally detach from failure, imho.The thing is that in most countries, people adore their national sport stars unconditionally (okay, this is really generalising, so just knock me off if this is completely wrong), but in Denmark there always seems to be a high degree of contempt and suspicion. For example, "he always crashes anyway", "he might have won that race and such and such but in the Tour, when it matters, he is poor" and most prevalently: "(when something bad happens for a local star)" are the usual comments you see on social media all the time.
So many people are more than ready to pick up the torches when respected media come up with unsubstantiated rumours like this. Why this is the case so much in Denmark, I have no idea.
The thing is that in most countries, people adore their national sport stars unconditionally (okay, this is really generalising, so just knock me off if this is completely wrong), but in Denmark there always seems to be a high degree of contempt and suspicion. For example, "he always crashes anyway", "he might have won that race and such and such but in the Tour, when it matters, he is poor" and most prevalently: "(when something bad happens for a local star)" are the usual comments you see on social media all the time.
So many people are more than ready to pick up the torches when respected media come up with unsubstantiated rumours like this. Why this is the case so much in Denmark, I have no idea.
Possibly, I don't know the details, but seems like it might be pretty premature at this point.Perhaps not but while breaking the story would have been a good time to provide the substance if it exists.
Just meeting with Ferrari carries a two year ban.
I guess to state the obvious, Armstrong and Ferrari are not the same person.Not in reality - A few in the American peleton meet and train with Armstrong and nothing happens.
Yeah, and it's not like he was squeaky clean before. The way he climbed during the 2009 Dauphiné, dropping Contador and Cadel "Ferrari engine" Evans came way out of left field![]()
This might be the "ferrari effect" on a rider's career.
I guess to state the obvious, Armstrong and Ferrari are not the same person.
Very.How absolutely *** stupid does a pro cyclist have to be to have any contact with Ferrari these days whatsoever?
Well it's justifiable imo if you look at the CQ ranking graph rollthedice shared above. ;PHow absolutely *** stupid does a pro cyclist have to be to have any contact with Ferrari these days whatsoever?
Are you already sure these are unsubstantiated rumors? Seems a bit early to make that call.
I don't think this looks like "unsubstantiated rumors":
"The 24 pages long report was commissioned by Cycling Anti-Doping Foundation (CADF), international cycling’s independent watchdog and written by a well-reputed external company. It is based on »intelligence« suggesting that the Danish sport star is linked to the banned physician Michele Ferrari.
»CADF intelligence indicates that Astana Pro Team cyclist Jakob FUGLSANG is under Michele FERRARI’s doping program, and that teammate Alexey LUTSENKO was present during at least one meeting between the two in Nice/Monaco«, the report says.
For some reason CADF deemed Fuglsang suspicious, ordered a report, Danish media got hold of it. All over the world cycling media picked it up. Now let's hear some Birdsong reactions.